InteraXon Inc. et al v. Neurotek, LLC et al
Filing
113
ORDER denying 58 Second MOTION to Set Aside Default for Mindwaves and NeuroTek filed by Jonathan Daniel Cowan. Hearing on motion for default judgment continued to 11/17/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/20/16. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
INTERAXON INC., et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-05290-KAW
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION
TO REMOVE DEFAULTS
9
10
NEUROTEK, LLC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 58
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Pro se defendant Jonathan Cowan moves to set aside the defaults entered against Neurotek,
14
LLC and Mindwaves, LTD, two corporations in which Cowan holds a controlling interest. (Dkt.
15
No. 58.) The Court deems the motion suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil
16
Local Rule 7-1(b). In the motion, he asks the Court:
18
1. To rule that Cowan can move the Court for rulings that will affect the other
Defendants, since he has a controlling interest in each of them, without formally
representing or making an appearance for them.
19
2. To Remove the Defaults of NeuroTek and Mindwaves granted on 3/11/16.
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. As an alternative to 1-2, to appoint a pro-bono attorney to represent the three
Defendants, at least for the limited purpose of setting aside the Defaults, and give
him adequate time to familiarize himself with the case.
(Dkt. No. 58 at 2.)
Cowan's motion is denied. A corporation must appear through counsel. See Civil Local
Rule 3-9(b) ("A corporation, unincorporated association, partnership or other such entity may
appear only through a member of the bar of this Court."). As Cowan is not a member of the bar of
this Court, he may not represent Neurotek or Mindwaves. This includes filing motions on their
behalf. Neurotek and Mindwaves may seek to set aside the defaults entered against them once
1
they have obtained counsel at their own expense. Cowan's request for pro-bono appointment of
2
counsel for his corporate entities is denied, as the Federal Pro Bono Project is available to
3
individuals who are indigent. If Cowan believes he meets the financial eligibility criteria for
4
appointment of pro bono counsel, he may make such a request on his own behalf, not that of his
5
companies. The Court will continue the hearing on the pending motion for default judgment,
6
currently set for August 4, 2016, to November 17, 2016 so that these companies have an
7
opportunity to obtain counsel. Any attorney representing either or both entities shall file a notice
8
of appearance within 90 days of this order. If a notice of appearance is not filed on behalf of
9
either company, the motion for default judgment will be heard as scheduled. All motions filed by
10
Cowan that seek relief on behalf of Neurotek or Mindwaves will be stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Dated:
07/20/16
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?