InteraXon Inc. et al v. Neurotek, LLC et al

Filing 113

ORDER denying 58 Second MOTION to Set Aside Default for Mindwaves and NeuroTek filed by Jonathan Daniel Cowan. Hearing on motion for default judgment continued to 11/17/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/20/16. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INTERAXON INC., et al., Case No. 15-cv-05290-KAW Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO REMOVE DEFAULTS 9 10 NEUROTEK, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 58 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Pro se defendant Jonathan Cowan moves to set aside the defaults entered against Neurotek, 14 LLC and Mindwaves, LTD, two corporations in which Cowan holds a controlling interest. (Dkt. 15 No. 58.) The Court deems the motion suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil 16 Local Rule 7-1(b). In the motion, he asks the Court: 18 1. To rule that Cowan can move the Court for rulings that will affect the other Defendants, since he has a controlling interest in each of them, without formally representing or making an appearance for them. 19 2. To Remove the Defaults of NeuroTek and Mindwaves granted on 3/11/16. 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. As an alternative to 1-2, to appoint a pro-bono attorney to represent the three Defendants, at least for the limited purpose of setting aside the Defaults, and give him adequate time to familiarize himself with the case. (Dkt. No. 58 at 2.) Cowan's motion is denied. A corporation must appear through counsel. See Civil Local Rule 3-9(b) ("A corporation, unincorporated association, partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court."). As Cowan is not a member of the bar of this Court, he may not represent Neurotek or Mindwaves. This includes filing motions on their behalf. Neurotek and Mindwaves may seek to set aside the defaults entered against them once 1 they have obtained counsel at their own expense. Cowan's request for pro-bono appointment of 2 counsel for his corporate entities is denied, as the Federal Pro Bono Project is available to 3 individuals who are indigent. If Cowan believes he meets the financial eligibility criteria for 4 appointment of pro bono counsel, he may make such a request on his own behalf, not that of his 5 companies. The Court will continue the hearing on the pending motion for default judgment, 6 currently set for August 4, 2016, to November 17, 2016 so that these companies have an 7 opportunity to obtain counsel. Any attorney representing either or both entities shall file a notice 8 of appearance within 90 days of this order. If a notice of appearance is not filed on behalf of 9 either company, the motion for default judgment will be heard as scheduled. All motions filed by 10 Cowan that seek relief on behalf of Neurotek or Mindwaves will be stricken. IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Dated: 07/20/16 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?