InteraXon Inc. et al v. Neurotek, LLC et al

Filing 88

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 6/28/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/5/2016 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/14/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 INTERAXON INC., ET AL, 6 No. C 15-5290 KAW Plaintiff(s), 7 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Reassigned Case] v. 8 NEUROTEK, LLC, ET AL, 9 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 12 13 The above-entitled matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Kandis A. Westmore for trial and all further proceedings, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Civil L.R.16-10, that a Case 15 Management Conference shall be held in this case on July 5, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., U.S. District 16 Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. 17 The parties shall appear in person or through lead trial counsel and shall be prepared to 18 discuss all items referred to in Civil L.R.16-10. Pursuant to Civil L.R.16-3 and 16-9, the parties 19 shall meet and confer and file joint case management statement and proposed order no later than 20 June 28, 2016. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate statements may be filed by each 21 party. 22 All documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall list the civil case number followed only 23 by the initials "KAW." One copy shall be clearly marked as a chambers copy. The parties are 24 reminded to review all of the undersigned’s standing orders, available at 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: June 14, 2016 ______________________________ Kandis A. Westmore United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?