InteraXon Inc. et al v. Neurotek, LLC et al

Filing 98

ORDER REGARDING UNUSUABLE CHAMBERS COPIES re 76 First MOTION for Sanctions Against Plaintiffs and Their Attorneys filed by Jonathan Daniel Cowan, 58 Second MOTION to Set Aside Default for Mindwaves and NeuroTek filed by Jonat han Daniel Cowan, 87 Reply to Opposition/Response filed by InteraXon U.S., Inc., InteraXon Inc., 56 MOTION for repeal of privileges of Plaintiff's Attorney's filed by Jonathan Daniel Cowan, 81 Opposition/Response to Motion file d by InteraXon U.S., Inc., InteraXon Inc., 72 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment filed by InteraXon U.S., Inc., InteraXon Inc., 55 MOTION to Strike Complaint filed by Jonathan Dan iel Cowan, 54 MOTION to Strike filed by InteraXon U.S., Inc., InteraXon Inc., 80 MOTION to Strike filed by InteraXon U.S., Inc., InteraXon Inc.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/01/16. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

INTERAXON INC., et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-05290-KAW

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER REGARDING UNUSABLE
CHAMBERS COPIES

9
10

NEUROTEK, LLC, et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 54, 55, 56, 58, 72, 76, 80, 81,

Defendants.
87

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the chambers copy of all filings Defendant Jonathan Cowan

14

has submitted in connection Dkt. Nos. 54, 55, 56, 58, 72, 76, and 80 was submitted in a format

15

that is not usable by the court.

16

The chambers copy is not usable because it

17

☐

consists of a stack of loose paper wrapped with a rubber band;

18

☐

consists of a stack of loose paper fastened with a binder clip or a paper clip;

19

☐

is too thick to permit secure fastening with a staple, and is fastened with a
brad-type fastener that is too short for the thickness of the document;

20
21

☒

has no tabs for the voluminous exhibits;

22

☐

includes exhibits that are illegible;

23

☐

includes exhibits that are unreadable because the print is too small;

24

☐

includes text and/or footnotes in a font smaller than 12 point;

25

☐

includes portions or exhibits that are redacted because the submitting party
has requested leave to file those portions under seal; or

26
27
28

☒

is not usable for another reason – The document does not contain the ECF header

at the top of each page.

1

The paper used for the above-described chambers copy has been recycled by the court.

2

Defendant Jonathan Cowan shall submit a chambers copy in a format that is usable by the court no

3

later than July 12, 2016. Plaintiffs shall lodge courtesy copies of Dkt. Nos. 81 and 87, which have

4

not been received by the Court, by no later than July 8, 2016.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 07/01/16
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2