Bluestone Innovations LLC v. Torchstar Corp.
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/20/16. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Steven T. Lowe, Esq. SBN 122208
steven@lowelaw.com
Kris LeFan, Esq., SBN 278611
kris@lowelaw.com
LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
11400 Olympic Blvd., Suite 640
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Telephone: (310) 477-5811
Facsimile: (310) 477-7672
Hao Ni (pro hac vice)
hni@nilawfirm.com
NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75231
Telephone: (972) 331-4600
Facsimile: (972) 314-0900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bluestone Innovations LLC
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
_
BLUESTONE INNOVATIONS LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
TORCHSTAR CORP.,
Case No. 4:15-cv-05481-PJH
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN
ORDER OF STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Joint Motion for Entry of an Order Reflecting the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05481-PJH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER REFLECTING THE
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and
Defendant Torchstar Corp. (“Torchstar”) by and through their attorneys, do hereby jointly move
for an order approving their stipulation as follows:
All claims between Bluestone and Torchstar are dismissed with prejudice.
Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal action and
the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.
The Court may enter an Order adopting this Stipulation of Dismissal (with Prejudice) and
Proposed Order Thereon as the Order of the Court.
Dated: April 20, 2016
By: /s/ Hao Ni
Dated: April 20, 2016
By: /s/
12
13
14
Hao Ni
Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bluestone Innovations, LLC
Johnny Chiu
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
Torchstar Corp.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Joint Motion for Entry of an Order Reflecting the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05481-PJH
1
2
FILER’S ATTESTATION
3
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Hao Ni, attest that concurrence in the fil-
4
ing of this document has been obtained.
5
Dated: April 20, 2016
/s/ Hao Ni
Hao Ni
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
Joint Motion for Entry of an Order Reflecting the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05481-PJH
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
2
3
4
5
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Bluestone Innovations LLC (“Bluestone”) and
Defendant Torchstar Corp. (“Torchstar”) parties to this legal action, by and through their attor-
6
neys, jointly moved for an order approving their stipulation. After consideration of such motion,
7
it is hereby GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that:
8
9
10
11
12
1.
All claims and counterclaims between Bluestone and Torchstar are dismissed with
prejudice; and
2.
Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to this legal ac-
tion and the entry of this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.
13
20th
Signed this _____ day of April, 2016.
15
RT
18
19
A
H
ER
Hamilton
R NIA
NO
hyllis J.
Judge P
FO
S
UNIT
ED
17
___________________________________
E
United States District Court RED
O ORD Judge
IT IS S
RT
U
O
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Joint Motion for Entry of an Order Reflecting the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05481-PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?