Yue v. MSC Software Corporation
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 17 Motion to Dismiss (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
DONGXIAO YUE,
8
Case No. 15-cv-5526-PJH
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS
9
MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION,
10
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Defendant’s motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on February
14
24, 2016. Plaintiff Dongxiao Yue (“plaintiff”) appeared in pro per. Defendant MSC
15
Software Corporation (“defendant”) appeared through its counsel, Jed Wakefield. Having
16
read the papers filed in conjunction with the motion and carefully considered the
17
arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
18
DENIES defendant’s motion.
19
Defendant seeks dismissal based on the nominative fair use doctrine. However,
20
the primary case cited by defendant (in its papers and at the hearing) is a case that was
21
decided at the summary judgment stage, not at the motion to dismiss stage. See Adobe
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Systems Inc. v. Christenson, 891 F.Supp.2d 1194, 1205-08 (D. Nev. 2012). Moreover,
the Ninth Circuit authority cited within Adobe further shows that the nominative fair use
defense is properly decided at the summary judgment stage, because the applicable test
provides that “[a] defendant seeking to assert nominative fair use as a defense need only
show that it used the mark to refer to the trademarked good,” which then shifts the
burden “to the plaintiff to show a likelihood of confusion.” Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.,
Inc. v. Tabari, 610 F.3d 1171, 1183 (9th Cir. 2010). Applying such a burden-shifting test
1
at this stage of the case would be premature, and thus, d
o
p
defendant’s motion to dismiss is
s
2
DE
ENIED.
3
4
5
6
S
RED.
IT IS SO ORDER
Da
ated: Febru
uary 24, 201
16
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?