Yue v. MSC Software Corporation

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 17 Motion to Dismiss (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DONGXIAO YUE, 8 Case No. 15-cv-5526-PJH Plaintiff, 7 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 9 MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION, 10 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Defendant’s motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on February 14 24, 2016. Plaintiff Dongxiao Yue (“plaintiff”) appeared in pro per. Defendant MSC 15 Software Corporation (“defendant”) appeared through its counsel, Jed Wakefield. Having 16 read the papers filed in conjunction with the motion and carefully considered the 17 arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby 18 DENIES defendant’s motion. 19 Defendant seeks dismissal based on the nominative fair use doctrine. However, 20 the primary case cited by defendant (in its papers and at the hearing) is a case that was 21 decided at the summary judgment stage, not at the motion to dismiss stage. See Adobe 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Systems Inc. v. Christenson, 891 F.Supp.2d 1194, 1205-08 (D. Nev. 2012). Moreover, the Ninth Circuit authority cited within Adobe further shows that the nominative fair use defense is properly decided at the summary judgment stage, because the applicable test provides that “[a] defendant seeking to assert nominative fair use as a defense need only show that it used the mark to refer to the trademarked good,” which then shifts the burden “to the plaintiff to show a likelihood of confusion.” Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Tabari, 610 F.3d 1171, 1183 (9th Cir. 2010). Applying such a burden-shifting test 1 at this stage of the case would be premature, and thus, d o p defendant’s motion to dismiss is s 2 DE ENIED. 3 4 5 6 S RED. IT IS SO ORDER Da ated: Febru uary 24, 201 16 __ __________ __________ __________ _______ PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON Un nited States District Ju s udge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?