AnTran Business LLC v. The Secret Kitchen LLC et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) AND FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION OVER ACTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/25/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Jon R. Robertson, APC (CSBN 134490)
Walter M. Crandall, Esq. (CSBN 250976)
ROBERTSON & OLSEN LLP
2601 Main Street, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANTRAN BUSINESS LLC,
a California limited liability company
Aaron K. McClellan, Esq., SBN 197185
[e-mail]
Thomas P. Mazzucco, Esq., SBN 139758
[e-mail]
Patrick J. Wingfield, Esq., SBN 265140
[e-mail]
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

C. TODD NORRIS (SBN 181337)
PAUL D. NELSON (SBN 62258)
Bullivant Houser Bailey PC
235 Pine Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94104-2752
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.352.2701
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants (See Sig. Page)

Attorneys for Defendants (See Signature Page)

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

ANTRAN BUSINESS LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company,

19

Plaintiff,

20

CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05601-KAW
)
)
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
)
ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
)
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)
)
AND FOR RETENTION OF
)
JURISDICTION OVER ACTION TO
)
ENFORCE)SETTLEMENT : ORDER
)
Honorable Kandis A. Westmore
)
)
)
)
)

v.

21
22
23

THE SECRET KITCHEN LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company doing business as
SECRET KITCHEN, and BRENDA
ANDERSON, an individual,
Defendants.

24
25

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by Plaintiff AnTran Business LLC (“AnTran”) on the one hand, and Defendant

27
28

The Secret Kitchen LLC doing business as Secret Kitchen and Defendant Brenda Anderson
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(A) AND FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION OVER ACTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05601-KAW

1
2
3

(collectively “Secret Kitchen”), on the other hand, through their respective counsel of record, that
the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its
own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4
5

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between AnTran and Secret Kitchen that the

6

Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action following its dismissal for the sole purpose of

7

enforcing the parties’ confidential settlement agreement.

8

Respectfully submitted,

9
10

Dated: May 18, 2016

ROBERTSON & OLSEN, LLP
By:

11
12
13
14

Dated: May 18, 2016

/s/ WALTER M. CRANDALL
WALTER M. CRANDALL, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANTRAN BUSINESS LLC
BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

15
By:
16
17
18
19

Dated: May 18, 2016

/s/ C. TODD NORRIS_________
C. TODD NORRIS, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants
THE SECRET KITCHEN LLC and
BRENDA ANDERSON
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY &
FEENEY

20
By:
21
22
23

/s/ PATRICK J. WINGFIELD
PATRICK J. WINGFIELD, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants
THE SECRET KITCHEN LLC and
BRENDA ANDERSON

24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(A) AND FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION OVER ACTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05601-KAW

1

ORDER

2
3
4
5

The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Action
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and for Retention of Jurisdiction over Action to
Enforce Settlement (“Stipulation”), and good cause appearing:

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED and the above-captioned

7

action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties shall bear their own attorney fees and

8

costs.

9
10
11
12

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this
action following its dismissal for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the parties’ confidential
settlement agreement.

13
14
15

May 25, 2016
Dated: _____________

______________________________________
Hon. Kandi A. Westmore

16
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(A) AND FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION OVER ACTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 4:15-cv-05601-KAW