Wyatt v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.

Filing 30

ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING ON o 19 MOTION to Dismiss ; RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Responses due by 4/25/2016. Replies due by 5/2/2016. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/13/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

GERARD EA
G
ARL WYATT,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
WILSON SPO
W
ORTING GO
OODS CO.,
Defendant.
.

Case No. 1
15-cv-05792
2-JSW
ORDER S
SCHEDULIN HEARI
NG
ING ON
MOTION TO DISMI
ISS; RE-SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDU
G
ULE; AND
VACATIN CASE M
NG
MANAGEM
MENT
CONFERE
ENCE
Re: Docket Nos. 19, 27
t
7

12
13

On Mar 28, 2016 Defendant filed a moti to dismis (Docket No. 19.) On March 31,
rch
6,
t
ion
ss.
n

14

201 this case was reassig
16,
gned to the undersigned J
Judge. Defe
endant has no yet re-not
ot
ticed its

15

mo
otion to dism for a hea
miss
aring on this Court’s law and motion calendar. T Court H
w
n
The
HEREBY

16

SC
CHEDULES that motion for a hearin on June 10 2016 at 9: a.m. in C
ng
0,
:00
Courtroom 5 of the

17

Un
nited States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, 2d Flo Oakland California In addition the Court
C
S
oor,
d,
a.
n,

18

sha modify th briefing sc
all
he
chedule on Defendant’s motion to di
D
ismiss. Plai
intiff’s opposition shall

19

be due by no la than Apr 25, 2016, and Defend
ater
ril
,
dant’s reply s
shall be due on May 2, 2
2016. If the

20

Court determin the motio can be res
nes
on
solved witho oral argu
out
ument, it sha notify the parties in
all

21

adv
vance of the hearing date On March 31, 2016, t Court sc
e.
h
this
cheduled the matter for a case
e

22

ma
anagement co
onference on April 29, 2016. (Dock No. 27.) In light of th pending m
n
2
ket
he
motion to

23

dis
smiss, the Co VACAT the case managemen conferenc and it wil reschedule the case
ourt
TES
e
nt
ce,
ll
e

24

ma
anagement co
onference af it resolve the motio n to dismiss
fter
es
s.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 13 2016
3,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge