Walker v. Krol et al
Filing
71
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/6/2025. **This Order TERMINATES Docket No. 70 .** (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JEFFREY E. WALKER,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON
APPEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 70
KROL, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Pursuant to the December 16, 2024 referral notice from the United States Court of Appeals
14
for the Ninth Circuit, Dkt. No. 70, the Court finds that the appeal is frivolous. On September 12,
15
2024, in a reasoned order and following supplemental briefing, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request
16
to reopen this action four years after its closure. Dkt. No. 66. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis
17
on appeal is therefore DENIED and Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. See 28
18
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). This case
19
remains closed. The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals.
20
This order terminates Dkt. No. 70.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: 1/6/2025
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?