Russel I Kassman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Filing 38

ORDER Requesting Response from Defendant re 23 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/1/2016.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RUSSEL I. KASSMAN, Case No. 15-cv-05873-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANT 9 10 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On April 15, 2016, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 13 First Amended Complaint. [Docket No. 23.] Plaintiff Russel Kassman failed to file an opposition 14 or statement of nonopposition. The court issued an Order to Show Cause for Plaintiff’s failure to 15 do so. [Docket No. 32.] Plaintiff’s counsel responded that he had not followed the Northern 16 District of California Civil Local Rules to calculate the response deadline, and that he intended to 17 file a Second Amended Complaint by May 18, 2016. [Docket No. 33.] 18 On May 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. [Docket No. 35.] 19 Plaintiff never filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, and Defendant never filed a 20 reply brief. 21 On this record, it is unclear whether Defendant intends to withdraw its Motion to Dismiss 22 the First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 23] in light of the Plaintiff’s filing of the Second 23 Amended Complaint, or whether it intends to proceed on the motion. Defendant shall file a letter 24 stating its intention by 1:00 p.m. on June 3, 2016. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2016 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?