Joseph Ercoli v. JLC Productions et al

Filing 17

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2016 is CONTINUED to Monday, 6/20/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Compliance Hearing regarding service is set for Friday, 5/13/2016 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/7/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JOSEPH ERCOLI, Case No. 15-cv-06333-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 7 TOP SHELF CLASSICS, ET AL., ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 8 9 A compliance hearing regarding plaintiff's failure to serve defendant Top Shelf Classics1 shall be held on Friday, May 13, 2016 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. As required by the Federal 12 Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs must serve all defendants within ninety (90) days after filing a 13 complaint, at which point the Court must either dismiss the action or order that service be made 14 within a specified time. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 15 Accordingly, five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the 16 plaintiff shall file either: (1) certifications noting that service upon defendants has been 17 effectuated; or (2) a one-page statement setting forth an explanation for his failure to comply. If 18 19 20 21 22 23 compliance is complete, the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Failure to comply may result in sanctions. The Court CONTINUES the Case Management Conference set for April 11, 2016 to June 20, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2016 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 1 27 28 In plaintiff's Case Management Statement, plaintiff suggests, but does not explicitly note, that service upon defendants Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant and Intercontinental Hotel Groups have been effectuated. (Dkt. No. 16, ¶1.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?