Grimes v. Doe

Filing 2

ORDER RETURNING COMPLAINTS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 04/09/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2015)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8

v.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

11

Defendants.
________________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,

14
15
16
17

v.
DIANA STARNES, aka DIANA GRIMESSTARNES,
Defendant.
________________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,

20
21
22

No. C 15-80099M CW

Plaintiff,

18
19

No. C 15-80100M CW

Plaintiff,

12
13

ORDER RETURNING
COMPLAINTS TO
PLAINTIFF

AMY (DOE), et al.,

9
10

No. C 15-80107M CW

v.
CHRISTOPHER “CHRIS” SHULTZ, et
al.
Defendant.
________________________________/
On December 9, 2005, this Court entered a pre-filing order

23
regarding the cases filed by Plaintiff Jerome Grimes.

The pre-

24
filing order states that if Mr. Grimes files a complaint that is
25
“related to any of the following matters:
26
27
28

(1) a diversified group of individuals who commit acts
of terror against Mr. Grimes, his family and other
citizens;

1
2
3
4
5

(2) an injunction against the defendants to prevent them
from kidnaping, framing, falsely imprisoning or
otherwise terrorizing Mr. Grimes, his family, and other
citizens;
(3) a court order for the defendants to be subjected to
a lie detector test;
(4) covert terrorism
it will not be filed unless it presents cognizable claims that are

6
not based on merely conclusory allegations.

Second, no other

7
complaints filed by Mr. Grimes while he is not incarcerated or
8
detained will be filed unless they contain intelligible factual
9
allegations and claims for relief.”
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

The Court has reviewed the above-captioned complaints filed
11
by Mr. Grimes and finds that they shall not be filed because they
12
allege that Defendants are engaged in terrorism.

Mr. Grimes

13
alleges no cognizable causes of action in these complaints.
14
Because the above-captioned complaints concern matters
15
mentioned in the pre-filing order and present no cognizable cause
16
of action, the Clerk of the Court is ordered not to file them.
17
Instead, the complaints shall be returned to Mr. Grimes.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: 04/09/2015
21

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2