Grimes v. Alhstrom et al

Filing 2

ORDER RETURNING COMPLAINT TO PLAINTIFF (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED), ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/29/15. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

JEROME L. GRIMES,

5

Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

MYERS URBATSCH, PC,
Defendant.

8
9
10

_______________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,

12
13

No. C 15-80155M CW

Plaintiff,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

No. C 15-80147M CW

v.
MICHAEL ALHSTROM, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

_______________________________/

16

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19

No. C 15-80167M CW

v.
MIESHALEEN TITUS, et al.,

20

Defendants.

21

_______________________________/

22

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25

v.
CITCO OIL COMPANY, et al.,

26
27

Defendants.

28

_______________________________/

No. C 15-80175M CW

1

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,

2
3
4
5
6
7

No. C 15-80194M CW

v.
UNKNOWN,

ORDER RETURNING
Defendant.

COMPLAINTS TO

________________________________/

PLAINTIFF

On December 9, 2005, this Court entered a pre-filing order

8

regarding the cases filed by Plaintiff Jerome Grimes.

9

filing order states that if Mr. Grimes files a complaint that is

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

The pre-

“related to any of the following matters:
(1) a diversified group of individuals who commit acts
of terror against Mr. Grimes, his family and other
citizens;
(2) an injunction against the defendants to prevent
them from kidnaping, framing, falsely imprisoning or
otherwise terrorizing Mr. Grimes, his family, and other
citizens;

16

(3) a court order for the defendants to be subjected to
a lie detector test;

17

(4) covert terrorism

18

it will not be filed unless it presents cognizable claims that

19

are not based on merely conclusory allegations.

20

complaints filed by Mr. Grimes while he is not incarcerated or

21

detained will be filed unless they contain intelligible factual

22

allegations and claims for relief.”

23

Second, no other

The Court has reviewed the above-captioned complaints filed

24

by Mr. Grimes and finds that they shall not be filed because they

25

relate to matters described by the pre-filing order or fail to

26

contain intelligible factual allegations and claims for relief.

27
28
2

1

I.

Case No. 15-80147

2

The complaint in this case makes various allegations

3

surrounding the administration of Plaintiff’s mother’s estate

4

following her death in 2012.

5

intelligible factual allegations and claims for relief.

6

Accordingly, it shall not be filed.

7

II.

8
9

The complaint does not contain

Case Nos. 15-80155, 15-80167, 15-80175 and 15-80194
The Court finds that the complaints in these cases shall not

be filed because they allege that Defendants are engaged in
terrorism.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

One of the cases, 14-80155 also seeks a court order

for Defendants to be subjected to a lie detector test.

12

Grimes alleges no cognizable causes of action in these

13

complaints.

Mr.

14

CONCLUSION

15

Because the above-captioned complaints concern multiple

16

matters mentioned in the pre-filing order, present no cognizable

17

cause of action or fail to contain intelligible factual

18

allegations and claims for relief, the Clerk of the Court is

19

ordered not to file them.

20

returned to Mr. Grimes.

21

Instead, the complaints shall be

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated:7/29/15

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
3

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MYERS URBATSCH, PC,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL ALHSTROM, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MIESHALEEN TITUS, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITCO OIL COMPANY, et al.,

Case No. 15-mc-80147-CW

No. C 15-80155M CW

No. C 15-80167M CW

No. C 15-80175M CW

Defendants.
_______________________________/
JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Defendant.
________________________________/

No. C 15-80194M CW

Certificate of Service

20
21
22
23

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 29, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing

24

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

25

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery

26

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

27
28
4

1
2
3

Jerome L. Grimes
500 Office Center Drive
Suite 400
Ft. Washington, PA 19034
(Original Complaints Returned)

4
Dated: July 29, 2015
5
6
7

Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court

8
9
10

By:________________________
Jean Ballard, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5