Trulove v. San Francisco et al

Filing 134

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying in part and granting in part 120 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 JAMAL RASHID TRULOVE, Plaintiff, 10 Vs. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL, 13 Defendants. Case No.: 16-CV-050 YGR ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MAUREEN D'AMICO, JOHN EVANS, MICHAEL E JOHNSON, RONAN SHOULDICE, AND CITY & COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DKT. NO. 120 14 15 On February 28, 2017, Defendants Maureen D’Amico, John Evans, Michael E. Johnson, 16 Ronan Shouldice, and City & County San Francisco filed their motion to dismiss portions of the 17 Second Amended Complaint of plaintiff Jamal Trulove. (Dkt. No. 120.) The matter was fully 18 briefed and came on regularly for hearing on April 25, 2017. 19 Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the matters judicially noticeable, and the 20 pleadings in this action, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS the motion to 21 dismiss as to Defendant City and County of San Francisco as unopposed, and DENIES the Motion to 22 Dismiss as to defendants Maureen D’Amico, John Evans, Michael E. Johnson, and Ronan 23 Shouldice. 24 This terminates Docket No. 120. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: April 27, 2017 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?