Trulove v. San Francisco et al
Filing
134
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying in part and granting in part 120 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
JAMAL RASHID TRULOVE,
Plaintiff,
10
Vs.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
ET AL,
13
Defendants.
Case No.: 16-CV-050 YGR
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN
PART MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MAUREEN
D'AMICO, JOHN EVANS, MICHAEL E
JOHNSON, RONAN SHOULDICE, AND CITY &
COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO TO DISMISS
PORTIONS OF SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
DKT. NO. 120
14
15
On February 28, 2017, Defendants Maureen D’Amico, John Evans, Michael E. Johnson,
16
Ronan Shouldice, and City & County San Francisco filed their motion to dismiss portions of the
17
Second Amended Complaint of plaintiff Jamal Trulove. (Dkt. No. 120.) The matter was fully
18
briefed and came on regularly for hearing on April 25, 2017.
19
Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the matters judicially noticeable, and the
20
pleadings in this action, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS the motion to
21
dismiss as to Defendant City and County of San Francisco as unopposed, and DENIES the Motion to
22
Dismiss as to defendants Maureen D’Amico, John Evans, Michael E. Johnson, and Ronan
23
Shouldice.
24
This terminates Docket No. 120.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: April 27, 2017
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?