Trulove v. San Francisco et al

Filing 78

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/31/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2016)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
TRULOVE,

4

Case No. 16-cv-0050-YGR
Plaintiffs,

5
v.

CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER

6
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

7

Defendants.

8
9

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

10

The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:

Monday, February 13, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

13

PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SPERO FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

10/25/16 at 9:30 a.m.

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

April 7, 2017

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):

Opening: April 14, 2017
Rebuttal: April 28, 2017

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

May 19, 2017

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY:

July 25, 2017

COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)

Friday, September 22, 2017 at 9:01 a.m.

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

September 29, 2017

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, October 13, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, October 30, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. for
4 weeks
(Jury Trial)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

1

28

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary
judgment.

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet

2

and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance

3

hearing on Friday, September 22, 2017 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have

4

reviewed the Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The

5

compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland,

6

California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the

7

parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this

8

requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not

9

appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be

10

allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

1

result in sanctions.

12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2