Moss v. SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Mediate Under General Order 56 filed by Nicole Moss, City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/10/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CELIA McGUINNESS, ESQ. (SBN 159420) THE DERBY LAW FIRM P.C. 1255 Treat Blvd. Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: (925) 472-6640 Facsimile: (925) 933-3964 celia@derbydisabilitylaw.com PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510/832-5001 Facsimile: 510/832-4787 reinlawoffice@aol.com MICHAEL E. GATTO, Esq. (SBN 196474) VAN BLOIS & ASSOCIATES 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 565 Oakland, CA 94621 Phone: 510.635.1284 Fax: 510.635.1516 mgatto@vanbloislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff NICOLE MOSS 14 * Defendants and their counsel listed after the caption. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 NICOLE MOSS, 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; and DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, 25 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW Civil Rights STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO MEDIATE UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 Defendants. 26 27 28 // 1 STIP TO EXTEND GO 56 DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW C:\Users\IMBRIA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\notesF8C1A4\2017 02 23 stip to continue deadline to mediate.docx 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194 Chief Trial Deputy THOMAS S. LAKRITZ, State Bar #161234 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-4218 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: tom.lakritz@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 10 STIPULATION 11 Plaintiff NICOLE MOSS (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 12 FRANCISCO hereby jointly stipulate and request through their attorneys of record that the deadline 13 to Mediation under General Order 56 be continued from March 7, 2017, until May 31, 2017. The 14 relevant history of the case is as follows: 15 16 17 1. The original date for filing a Notice of Need for Mediation was June 1, 2016, Docket No. 4. 2. Because the scope of the facilities at San Francisco General Hospital required more time 18 than usual for access experts to prepare a report, the parties stipulated to extend the 19 deadline for Plaintiff to file the Notice of Need for Mediation to December 15, 2016. 20 Docket No. 32. 21 3. Plaintiff filed the Notice of Need for Mediation on December 7, 2016. Docket No. 34. 22 4. The case was assigned a mediator on January 17, 2017. Docket No. 35. 23 5. Pursuant to General Order 56, the parties have 90 days from filing the Notice of Need 24 for Mediation to complete the mediation. Thus, the deadline to complete mediation is 25 March 7, 2017. 26 27 28 This request for an extension of time is based on the following good cause: 1. The parties have worked cooperatively to move through General Order 56. 2 STIP TO EXTEND GO 56 DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW C:\Users\IMBRIA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\notesF8C1A4\2017 02 23 stip to continue deadline to mediate.docx 1 2 2. The parties have engaged in significant pre-mediation discussion via telephone conference and email, facilitated by ADR Director Howard Herman. 3 3. The Parties agreed to join into this mediation another case, Moss v. Kindred Healthcare 4 Operating, Inc. et al., 4:16-cv-00657 YGR. The City of San Francisco is a defendant in 5 that matter as well. The Parties believe that mediating the cases together will facilitate a 6 more efficient resolution of all issues. 7 4. Due to the number of party representatives and attorneys involved in the two matters, the 8 Parties were unable to find a mutually agreeable date for mediation within the Court’s 9 deadline. 10 5. All parties have agreed to participate in mediation on May 9, 2017. 11 12 Therefore, in an effort to keep costs down and to facilitate efficient resolution of the case 13 through mediation and the General Order 56 process, the Parties stipulate and request that the Court 14 order the deadline for mediation to take place under General Order 56 be extended to May 31, 2017. 15 16 Date: March 3, 2017 17 THE LAW OFFICE OF PAUL L. REIN THE DERBY LAW FIRM, P.C. 18 By: /s/ Celia McGuinness CELIA McGUINNESS, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff NICOLE MOSS 19 20 21 22 Date: March 3, 2017 23 24 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS Chief Trial Deputy THOMAS S. LAKRITZ Deputy City Attorney 25 26 By: /s/ Thomas S. Lakritz THOMAS S. LAKRITZ, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 27 28 3 STIP TO EXTEND GO 56 DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW C:\Users\IMBRIA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\notesF8C1A4\2017 02 23 stip to continue deadline to mediate.docx ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 The deadline for the parties to mediate under General Order 56 is hereby continued to May 31, 4 2017. 5 6 7 3/10 Dated: _________, 2017 U.S. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIP TO EXTEND GO 56 DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW C:\Users\IMBRIA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\notesF8C1A4\2017 02 23 stip to continue deadline to mediate.docx FILER’S ATTESTATION 1 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on March 3, 2017, I, Celia McGuinness, 3 attorney with The Law Office of Paul L. Rein., received the concurrence of Thomas S. Lakritz in 4 the filing of this document. 5 /s/ Celia McGuinness Celia McGuinness 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 STIP TO EXTEND GO 56 DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00072 KAW C:\Users\IMBRIA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\notesF8C1A4\2017 02 23 stip to continue deadline to mediate.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?