Fitbit Inc. v. AliphCom et al.

Filing 50

ORDER re: Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (Dkt. No. 44 in 5:15-cv-04073-EJD). The court has reviewed the motion and determined that the cases are not related and that no reassignments shall occur. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/25/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 FITBIT, INC., Case No. 5:15-cv-04073-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED v. 10 11 ALIPHCOM, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 44 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Presently before the court is an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 to 14 consider whether the above-entitled action is related to another action pending in this district, 15 namely Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. d/b/a Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc., Case No. 4:16-cv- 16 00118-DMR. 17 18 The court has reviewed the motion and determined that the cases are not related and that no reassignments shall occur. 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 25, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:15-cv-04073-EJD ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?