Fitbit Inc. v. AliphCom et al.
Filing
50
ORDER re: Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (Dkt. No. 44 in 5:15-cv-04073-EJD). The court has reviewed the motion and determined that the cases are not related and that no reassignments shall occur. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/25/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
FITBIT, INC.,
Case No. 5:15-cv-04073-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
v.
10
11
ALIPHCOM, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 44
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Presently before the court is an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 to
14
consider whether the above-entitled action is related to another action pending in this district,
15
namely Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. d/b/a Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc., Case No. 4:16-cv-
16
00118-DMR.
17
18
The court has reviewed the motion and determined that the cases are not related and that no
reassignments shall occur.
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 25, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:15-cv-04073-EJD
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE
RELATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?