Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

Filing 279

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 271 2/11/19 Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. Case No. 4:16-cv-00119-HSG (KAW) ORDER REGARDING 2/11/19 JOINT LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 271 DROPBOX INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 On February 11, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery letter concerning Dropbox’s 14 request for an order requiring Synchronoss to make expert Christopher Alpaugh available for two 15 days of deposition. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 271 at 1.) Mr. Alpaugh’s deposition is noticed for 16 March 18, 2019. Id. Synchronoss has produced two expert reports authored by Mr. Alpaugh—on 17 infringement and damages, and validity— while Dropbox has designated two different experts on 18 those topics. Id. As a result, Dropbox contends that it needs a total of fourteen hours to adequately 19 depose Mr. Alpaugh. (Joint Letter at 2.) 20 In opposition, Synchronoss argues that the request is premature, and that the first seven 21 hours should go forward after which the parties shall meet and confer regarding what additional 22 time, if any, is necessary. (Joint Letter at 5.) 23 The Court disagrees. This is not a situation where Mr. Alpaugh is expected to testify on a 24 single report, and Dropbox may require more time, based on the substance of his testimony. 25 Rather, Dropbox knows that it requires more time, because Mr. Alpaugh is the designated expert 26 on multiple topics. While Synchronoss may designate the expert of its choice, it cannot 27 strategically do so in an effort to stifle Dropbox’s ability to properly depose an expert witness. 28 Indeed, Dropbox should be able to adequately prepare for the depositions in advance. 1 2 3 4 Accordingly, the Court orders Synchronoss to produce Mr. Alpaugh for two, seven-hour days. Each day will address a different expert report. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2019 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?