Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

Filing 444

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 442 Stipulation Changing Time. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2019)

Download PDF
1 [COUNSEL OF RECORD IDENTIFIED IN SIGNATURE BLOCK] 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:16-cv-00119-HSG-KAW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] DROPBOX, INC., Defendant. Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00119-HSG-KAW 1 Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc., (“Synchronoss”) and Defendant Dropbox, Inc., 2 (“Dropbox”) (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel, and subject to 3 the Court’s approval, stipulate as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, on July 3, 2019, Dropbox filed its Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF 436) and Bill of Costs (ECF 434); and 6 WHEREAS, in light of the July 4 holiday and conflicting deadlines facing counsel 7 for Synchronoss, there is good cause to extend the deadlines for Synchronoss’ Opposition to 8 Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF 436) and Objections to Bill of Costs by two days, 9 from July 17, 2019 to and including July 19, 2019, and to extend the deadlines for Dropbox’s 10 Reply to Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Declaration of 11 Sarah S. Eskandari in support of The Parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time, 12 “Eskandari Decl.,” ¶ 3); and 13 WHEREAS, on July 16 and 17, 2019, the Parties met and conferred via e-mail to 14 discuss the need for approaching the Court to request a brief extension of time for the deadline 15 for Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF 436) and 16 Objections to Bill of Costs (ECF 434) by two days, and to extend the deadline for Dropbox’s 17 Reply to Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees by two business 18 days, to and including July 30, 2019; (Eskandari Decl., ¶ 4); and 19 WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court extend the deadlines for 20 Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF 436) and Objections 21 to Bill of Costs (ECF 434) by two days, from July 17, 2019 to and including July 19, 2019, 22 and extend the deadline for Dropbox’s Reply to Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s 23 Motion for Attorney’s Fees by two business days, to and including July 30, 2019; and 24 WHEREAS, there have been nine prior time modifications in this case: (1) when the 25 Court granted Synchronoss’ motion for an extension of time to respond to Dropbox’s original 26 February 5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF 71); (2) when the Court granted the Parties’ 27 Stipulated Request for an extension of time for Dropbox to file its reply in support of the 28 Motion to Dismiss (ECF 90); (3) when the Court granted the Parties’ stipulated request for an 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00119-HSG-KAW 1 extension of time to submit their ESI Stipulation and Protective Order (ECF 123); (4) when 2 the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to Change the Deadline for Document 3 Production (ECF 187); (5) when the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to 4 Complete Currently Noticed Depositions Beyond The Close Of Fact Discovery (ECF 224); 5 (6) when the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to extend the deadlines to complete 6 currently noticed fact depositions and to serve expert disclosures and reports (ECF 232); 7 (7) when the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to extend further the deadlines to 8 complete currently noticed fact depositions and to serve expert disclosures and reports (ECF 9 244); and (8) when the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to complete currently 10 noticed expert depositions beyond the close of expert discovery (ECF 291); and (9) when the 11 Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request to reschedule the hearing date for dispositive 12 and Daubert motions (ECF 342). (Eskandari Decl., ¶ 5.) 13 WHEREAS, the Parties’ request will have no impact on the case schedule, as the only 14 pending item is the hearing for Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, which is noticed for 15 November 14, 2019. (Eskandari Decl., ¶ 6.) 16 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND 17 BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT, the 18 Parties respectfully request that the Court: (1) extend the deadlines for Synchronoss’ 19 Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF 436) and Objections to Bill of Costs 20 (ECF 434) by two days, from July 17, 2019 to and including July 19, 2019, and (2) extend the 21 deadline for Dropbox’s Reply to Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s 22 Fees by two business days, to and including July 30, 2019. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00119-HSG-KAW 1 2 Dated this 17th day of July, 2019. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Jonathan A. Patchen STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452) JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346) KARAN S. DHADIALLA (SBN 296313) TAYLOR & PATCHEN, LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 355 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 788-8200 Facsimile: (415) 788-8208 E-mail: staylor@taylorpatchen.com E-mail: jpatchen@taylorpatchen.com E-mail: kdhadialla@taylorpatchen.com /s/ Sarah S. Eskandari SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541) JENNIFER D. BENNETT (SBN 235196) DENTONS US LLP One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 267-4000 Facsimile: (415) 267-4198 Email: sarah.eskandari@dentons.com Email: jennifer.bennett@dentons.com MARK L. HOGGE (Pro Hac Vice) KIRK R. RUTHENBERG (Pro Hac Vice) NICHOLAS H. JACKSON (SBN 269976) KEVIN GREENLEAF (SBN 256896) RAJESH NORONHA (Pro Hac Vice) DENTONS US LLP 1900 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 408-6400 Facsimile: (202) 408-6399 Email: mark.hogge@dentons.com Email: kirk.ruthenberg@dentons.com Email: nicholas.jackson@dentons.com Email: kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com Email: rajesh.noronha@dentons.com THOMAS H. L. SELBY (pro hac vice) DAVID M. KRINSKY (pro hac vice) ADAM D. HARBER (pro hac vice) CHRISTOPHER J. MANDERNACH (pro hac vice) SARAH L. O’CONNOR (pro hac vice) D. SHAYON GHOSH (SBN 313628) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 434-5000 Facsimile: (202) 434-5029 E-mail: tselby@wc.com E-mail: dkrinsky@wc.com E-mail: aharber@wc.com E-mail: cmandernach@wc.com E-mail: soconnor@wc.com E-mail: sghosh@wc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant Dropbox, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00119-HSG-KAW 1 ORDER 2 THIS MATTER, came before the Court on a Stipulated Request for Order Changing 3 Time by Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. and Defendant Dropbox, Inc., (collectively, 4 the “Parties”). The Court, having reviewed and considered the submitted papers in this matter 5 and all relevant factual statements therein, hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Stipulated Request to 6 extend the deadlines for Synchronoss’ Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees 7 (ECF 436) and Objections to Bill of Costs (ECF 434) by two days, from July 17, 2019 to and 8 including July 19, 2019, and to extend the deadline for Dropbox’s Reply to Synchronoss’ 9 Opposition to Dropbox’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees to and including July 30, 2019. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 DATED: July 18, 2019 _____________________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00119-HSG-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?