Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc.

Filing 91

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 90 Stipulation Re Docket No. 86 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

NEIL ARTHUR SMITH
RIMON P.C.
One Embarcadero Center
Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-877-1938
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541)
DENTONS US LLP
One Market Plaza,
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

RYAN T. BEARD (pro hac vice)
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL (pro hac vice)
MEYERTONS, HOOD, KOWERT &
GOETZEL, P.C.
1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy., Building 2,
Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78746
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

MARK L. HOGGE (pro hac vice)
SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI
(pro hac vice)
NICHOLAS H. JACKSON (SBN 269976)
DENTONS US LLP
1900 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant
Egnyte, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.

15
16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

OAKLAND DIVISION

19

SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

21

Date: Nov. 1, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

v.

22

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE FILING EGNYTE’S CORRECTED
RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
BRIEF TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 45(b)

Defendant.

20
EGNYTE, INC.,

23
24

No. 4:16-cv-00120-HSG

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EGNYTE’S CORRECTED RESPONSIVE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-5(B)
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00120-HSG

1
2

Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. and Defendant Egnyte, Inc., by and through
their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, stipulate as follows:

3

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2017, Egynte filed and served its Responsive Claim

4

Construction Brief Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5(b) (Dkt. No. 86), which was missing a

5

portion substantially identical to arguments made by Dropbox, Inc. in their Responsive Claim

6

Construction Brief Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5(b) (Case No: 4:16-CV-00119-HSG, Dkt.

7

No. 150) ;

8

WHEREAS, on October 9, 2017, Egnyte discovered that the portion was missing and

9

emailed to counsel for Synchronoss a corrected version of its Responsive Claim Construction

10

Brief Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5(b) with the missing portion inserted;

11

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND

12

BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to

13

the Court’s approval:

14

1) Egnyte shall file and serve a Corrected Responsive Claim Construction Brief

15

Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-5(b) within two business days upon receiving the

16

Court’s approval.

17

\\

18

\\

19

\\

20

\\

21

\\

22

\\

23

\\

24

\\

25

\\

26

\\

27

\\

28

\\

1

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EGNYTE’S CORRECTED RESPONSIVE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-5(B)
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00120-HSG

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Dated this 16th day of October, 2017.
/s/ Sarah S. Eskandari
SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541)
DENTONS US LLP
One Market Plaza,
Spear Tower, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ Ryan T. Beard
NEIL ARTHUR SMITH
RIMON P.C.
One Embarcadero Center
Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-877-1938
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

MARK L. HOGGE (pro hac vice)
SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI
(pro hac vice)
NICHOLAS H. JACKSON (SBN 269976)
DENTONS US LLP
1900 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

RYAN T. BEARD (pro hac vice)
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL (pro hac vice)
MEYERTONS, HOOD, KOWERT &
GOETZEL, P.C.
1120 S. Capital of Texas Hwy., Building 2,
Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78746
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Egnyte, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.

18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24

10/17/2017
DATED ______________

_____________________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

2

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EGNYTE’S CORRECTED RESPONSIVE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-5(B)
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00120-HSG