Friends of Outlet Creek v. Grist Creek Aggregates, LLC

Filing 47

ORDER DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT STRIKE OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/29/18. Show Cause Response due by 2/2/2018. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

FR
RIENDS OF OUTLET CREEK,
F
C
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

10

GRIST CREE AGGREG
G
EK
GATES, LL
LC,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 1
16-cv-00431
1-JSW

Defendant.
.

ORDER T DEFEND
TO
DANT TO S
SHOW
CAUSE W
WHY THE C
COURT SH
HOULD
NOT STR
RIKE OBJEC
CTIONS TO
O
PLAINTIF
FF’S EVIDE
ENCE
Re: Dkt. N 45-6
Nos.

12
13

On Janu
uary 26, 201 Defendan filed its op
18,
nt
pposition to Plaintiff’s m
motion for su
ummary

14

jud
dgment. Def
fendant filed a separate pleading obj ecting to Pla
d
p
aintiff’s evid
dence, which consists of
h
f

15

sev
venteen page of objectio
es
ons. (Dkt. No. 45-6.) U
N
Under Northe District C
ern
Civil Local R 7-3(a),
Rule

16

“[a
a]ny evidenti
iary and proc
cedural obje
ections to the motion mu be contain within th brief or
e
ust
ned
he

17

me
emorandum.”
”

18

Accord
dingly, Defen
ndant is HER
REBY ORDE
ERED TO S
SHOW CAU why the Court
USE
e

19

sho
ould not strik the object
ke
tions for fail
lure to comp with the N
ply
Northern District Civil L
Local Rules.

20

De
efendant’s response to th Order to Show Cause shall be due by Februar 2, 2018, so that the
his
S
e
ry

21

Court may add
dress this issu before Pla
ue
aintiff’s repl is due. If the Court co
ly
f
onsiders the objections,

22

it will give Plai
w
intiff leave to file separa objection to Defend
t
ate
ns
dant’s eviden and to fil a separate
nce
le

23

res
sponse to De
efendant’s ob
bjections.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: January 29, 2018
y
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge