Brendan Huerta v. United States Department of Agriculture et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Agriculture Research Service, Brendan Huerta, United States Department of Agriculture, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER , 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Responses due by 5/20/2016. Replies due by 6/7/2016.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/8/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

STEVEN J. BRADY, ESQ. (State Bar No.116651)
BRADY LAW GROUP
1015 Irwin Street
San Rafael, CA 94901
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff,
BRENDAN HUERTA

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

OAKLAND DIVISION

10

B RADY L AW G ROUP

1015 Irwin Street, San Rafaell, CA 94901
415.459.7300 phone • 415.459.7303 fax

11
12

Case No.: 4:16-cv-00434

BRENDAN HUERTA
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: FILING OF OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS

vs.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE; AGRICULTURE
RESEARCH SERVICE and DOES 1-20,
Inclusive

DATE: July 7, 2016
TIME: 11:00 A.M.
COURTROOM TBA
Hon. Kandis A. Westmore

Defendants

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

This case is scheduled for a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on July 7, 2016.
The Motion to Dismiss was filed on March 24, 2016. The Local Rules mandate the filing of
Plaintiff’s Response on April 7, 2016 and the Defendants’ Reply on April 14, 2016.
Because the hearing is so far off, and to accommodate the schedules and caseloads of
the parties, with the permission of the Court, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties
that Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss may be filed on or before May 20,
2016 and Defendants’ Reply on or before June 7, 2016.

27
28

1

______________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - CASE NO. CV 16-00434 KAW

1

DATED: April 4, 2016

2

BRADY LAW GROUP
/s/
By: ____________________________
STEVEN J. BRADY, ESQ.1
Attorney for Plaintiff

3
4
5
6

DATED: April 4, 2016

7
8

BRIAN J. STRETCH, ESQ.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/
By: ____________________________
CLAIRE T. CORMIER, ESQ.
Assistant U.S. Attorney

9
10

B RADY L AW G ROUP

1015 Irwin Street, San Rafaell, CA 94901
415.459.7300 phone • 415.459.7303 fax

11
[PROPOSED ORDER]

12
13

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

14

ORDERED THAT:

15

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss may be filed on or before May

16

17 20, 2016.
18

Defendants’ Reply may be filed on or before June 7, 2016.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
4/8
Dated:_________________, 2016

21
22

_______________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

I, Steven J. Brady, hereby attest that I have been authorized to submit the electronic signatures
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
2

______________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - CASE NO. CV 16-00434 KAW