DS-Concept Trade Invest, LLC v. Gourmet Food Imports, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 6 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 DS-CONCEPT TRADE INVEST, LLC, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 v. GOURMET FOOD IMPORTS, LLC, et al., Case No.: 16-cv-00466 YGR ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendants. On January 27, 2016, plaintiff D-S Concept Trade Invest, LLC filed an ex parte application 13 for temporary restraining order (TRO). (Dkt. No. 6.) The Court finds that plaintiff failed to comply 14 with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 65(b)(1) as well as the Civil Local 15 Rule 65-1 to allow this Court to issue the TRO without notice to adverse parties. As set forth in the 16 FRCP itself, the Court may only issue a TRO without notice to adverse parties if: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (A) specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; and (B) the movant’s attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to give notice and the reasons why it should not be required. Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b)(1) (emphasis supplied). Plaintiff failed to show it met either of the above requirements or those of the Local Rule. Consequently, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s ex parte application for TRO WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling in accordance with the cited rules. This Order terminates Docket Number 6. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2016 26 27 28 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?