DS-Concept Trade Invest, LLC v. Gourmet Food Imports, LLC et al
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 6 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
DS-CONCEPT TRADE INVEST, LLC,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
v.
GOURMET FOOD IMPORTS, LLC, et al.,
Case No.: 16-cv-00466 YGR
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 6
Defendants.
On January 27, 2016, plaintiff D-S Concept Trade Invest, LLC filed an ex parte application
13
for temporary restraining order (TRO). (Dkt. No. 6.) The Court finds that plaintiff failed to comply
14
with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 65(b)(1) as well as the Civil Local
15
Rule 65-1 to allow this Court to issue the TRO without notice to adverse parties. As set forth in the
16
FRCP itself, the Court may only issue a TRO without notice to adverse parties if:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(A)
specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show
that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the
movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; and
(B)
the movant’s attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to
give notice and the reasons why it should not be required.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b)(1) (emphasis supplied). Plaintiff failed to show it met either of the above
requirements or those of the Local Rule. Consequently, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s ex parte
application for TRO WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling in accordance with the cited rules.
This Order terminates Docket Number 6.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 1, 2016
26
27
28
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?