Morris v. USA

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE 9 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/3/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) United States Attorney 2 THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) 3 Chief, Tax Division, Tax Division 4 MICHAEL G. PITMAN (DCBN 484164) Assistant United States Attorney 5 150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900 San Jose, CA 95113 6 Telephone: (408) 535-5040 Facsimile: (408) 535-5081 7 michael.g.pitman@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for the United States of America 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 Donald E. Morris, 13 Plaintiff, 14 Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW v. 15 United States of America, 16 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant the United States of America 19 (“United States”), and Plaintiff Donald E. Morris (“Plaintiff”) by and through undersigned counsel and 20 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and Local Civil Rule 6-2, that good cause exists and the parties 21 request that the Court continue the date for the United States to answer or otherwise respond to 22 Plaintiff’s Complaint, and the United States states as follows in support: 23 Plaintiffs commenced the instant action on or about January 27, 2016. Upon learning of the 24 Complaint, the Department of Justice contacted the Internal Revenue Service’s Office of Chief Counsel 25 and requested the administrative file associated with this case. The Office of Chief Counsel has yet to 26 provide a copy of the administrative file to the Department of Justice. Without the administrative file, 27 counsel for the United States is unable to prepare an adequate response to the Complaint. 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW 1 1 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that the United States shall have until May 31, 2016, to 2 answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The requested extension is not being made for 3 purposes of delay, but to allow for a review of the relevant administrative materials. No party has 4 obtained any previous extensions in this matter. 5 6 Respectfully submitted this 27th day of April, 2016, BRIAN J. STRETCH United States Attorney 7 8 s/ Michael G. Pitman MICHAEL G. PITMAN Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 Attorneys for United States of America 11 12 16 s/ Edward I. Kaplan EDWARD I. KAPLAN Greene Radovsky Maloney Share Hennigh LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 4000 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-248-1525 Fax: 415-777-4961 Email: ekaplan@greeneradovsky.com 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff Donald E. Morris 13 14 15 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 Upon stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the 21 United States of America shall have until May 31, 2016, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 22 Complaint. 23 24 3rd May SO ORDERED this _____ day of _________________, 2016. 25 ________________________________ THE HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 It is hereby certified that service of the foregoing STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 3 ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER has been made this 27th day of 4 April, 2016, by way of the Court’s ECF system to the following: 5 6 7 8 EDWARD I KAPLAN Greene Radovsky Maloney Share Hennigh LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 4000 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-248-1525 Fax: 415-777-4961 Email: ekaplan@greeneradovsky.com 9 s/ Michael G. Pitman MICHAEL G. PITMAN Assistant United States Attorney 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?