Morris v. USA
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 23 . Stipulation filed by Donald E Morris, USA. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/14/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017)
S
R NIA
A
H
ER
re
Westmo
FO
RT
andis
J u d ge K
LI
UNIT
ED
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
4 MICHAEL G. PITMAN (DCBN 484164)
Assistant United States Attorney
5 150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900
San Jose, CA 95113
(408) 535-5040
6 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(408) 535-5081
7 michael.pitman@usdoj.gov
RT
U
O
1 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)
United States Attorney
2
THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T)
3 Chief, Tax Division, Tax Division
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
8 Attorneys for the United States of America
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
F
D IS T IC T O
R
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
Donald E. Morris,
Plaintiff,
16
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
14
15
Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW
United States of America,
Defendant.
17
18
Defendant the United States of America (“United States”) Plaintiff Donald E. Morris
19 (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), to the dismissal of this matter in its entirety with prejudice, each party to bear its own
21 fees and costs.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW
1
1 Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
2
3
s/ Michael G. Pitman
MICHAEL G. PITMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
Attorneys for United States of America
6
7
11
____________________
EDWARD I. KAPLAN
Greene Radovsky Maloney Share Hennigh LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 4000
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-248-1525
Fax: 415-777-4961
Email: ekaplan@greeneradovsky.com
12
Attorney for Plaintiff Donald E. Morris
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 4:16-cv-00476-KAW
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?