Bridges v. Castelo

Filing 4

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: The Clerk of the Court shall transfer the case to the Central District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/9/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MICHAEL BRIDGES, Case No. 16-cv-00491-DMR (PR) Petitioner, 7 v. ORDER OF TRANSFER 8 9 JOSIE GASTELO, Acting Warden, Respondent. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Petitioner, a state prisoner who is incarcerated at the California Men’s Colony (“CMC”), 12 has filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging as a violation of his 13 constitutional rights a 2013 denial of parole by the California Board of Parole Hearings. Dkt. 1. 14 A petition for a writ of habeas corpus made by a person in custody under the judgment and 15 sentence of a state court of a State which contains two or more federal judicial districts may be 16 filed in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 17 The district court where the petition is filed, however, may transfer the petition to the other district 18 in the furtherance of justice. See id. Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear 19 petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction. See Dannenberg v. 20 Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 21 1968). If the petition is directed to the manner in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it 22 involves parole or time credits claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. See 23 Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). 24 Petitioner was convicted in Los Angeles County and the challenged parole hearing took 25 place in San Luis Obispo County, both of which are located in the Central District of California. 26 See 28 U.S.C. § 84(c). CMC, the place of Petitioner’s confinement, is also located in the Central 27 District of California. Id. Therefore, the Western Division of the United States District Court for 28 the Central District of California has jurisdiction over this matter. 1 Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the Western Division of the United States 2 District Court for the Central District of California.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Clerk of the 3 Court shall transfer the entire file to the Central District of California. Any remaining pending 4 motions are terminated as no longer pending before this court. Dkt. 2. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: February 9, 2016 ______________________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 Venue transfer is a non-dispositive matter and, thus, it falls within the scope of the jurisdiction of the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 MICHAEL BRIDGES, Case No. 4:16-cv-00491-DMR Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 CASTELO, Defendant. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on February 9, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Michael Bridges ID: H22876 California Men's Colony P.O. Box 8101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101 19 20 Dated: February 9, 2016 21 22 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 23 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ Ivy Lerma Garcia, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable DONNA M. RYU 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?