Brown v. Iosacco et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE 40 MOTION TO FILE RAND NOTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM E. BROWN, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-00603-HSG (PR) v. R. AMIS, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE RAND NOTICE Re: Dkt. No. 40 12 13 Good cause appearing, defendants’ administrative motion to file the notice required by 14 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), that was omitted from their September 19, 2017 15 motion to dismiss and for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is advised that the Rand 16 notice instructs him on what he must do to oppose a motion for summary judgment. The Court 17 sua sponte extends plaintiff’s deadline to file his opposition to the motion. Plaintiff’s opposition 18 to the motion to dismiss and for summary judgment must be filed with the Court and served upon 19 defendants no later than 28 days from the date of this order. Defendants shall file a reply brief no 20 later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. 21 This order terminates Dkt. No. 40. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: 9/28/2017 24 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?