Brown v. Iosacco et al
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE 40 MOTION TO FILE RAND NOTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM E. BROWN,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-00603-HSG (PR)
R. AMIS, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
Re: Dkt. No. 40
Good cause appearing, defendants’ administrative motion to file the notice required by
Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), that was omitted from their September 19, 2017
motion to dismiss and for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is advised that the Rand
notice instructs him on what he must do to oppose a motion for summary judgment. The Court
sua sponte extends plaintiff’s deadline to file his opposition to the motion. Plaintiff’s opposition
to the motion to dismiss and for summary judgment must be filed with the Court and served upon
defendants no later than 28 days from the date of this order. Defendants shall file a reply brief no
later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed.
This order terminates Dkt. No. 40.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?