Brown v. Iosacco et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE 40 MOTION TO FILE RAND NOTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

WILLIAM E. BROWN,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 16-cv-00603-HSG (PR)

v.
R. AMIS, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
RAND NOTICE
Re: Dkt. No. 40

12
13

Good cause appearing, defendants’ administrative motion to file the notice required by

14

Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), that was omitted from their September 19, 2017

15

motion to dismiss and for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is advised that the Rand

16

notice instructs him on what he must do to oppose a motion for summary judgment. The Court

17

sua sponte extends plaintiff’s deadline to file his opposition to the motion. Plaintiff’s opposition

18

to the motion to dismiss and for summary judgment must be filed with the Court and served upon

19

defendants no later than 28 days from the date of this order. Defendants shall file a reply brief no

20

later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed.

21

This order terminates Dkt. No. 40.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated: 9/28/2017

24
25
26
27
28

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge