Cisneros v. Vangilder et al

Filing 53

ORDER Granting (docket no. 52 in 4:16-cv-00735-HSG and docket no. 49 in 4:16-cv-01320-HSG) STIPULATION of Case Schedule: Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2017; Designation of Experts due by 5/22/2018; Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/22/20 18; Dispositive Motion due by 7/23/2018; Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2018 03:00 PM.; Jury Selection/Jury Trial (5-day) set for 11/13/2018 08:30 AM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/29/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California KYLE A. LEWIS Acting Supervising Deputy Attorney General IAN MICHAEL ELLIS Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 280254 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1179 Fax: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Ian.Ellis@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants S. Cupp, J. Cuske, D. Melton, K. Ohland, J. Vangilder, and J. Vasquez 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TIMOTHY LEWIS MOORE, State Bar No. 305168 Reed Smith, LLP 101 2nd Street, STE 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 659-5651 Fax: (415) 391-8269 E-mail: tmoore@reedsmith.com Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros GERALD SINGLETON, State Bar No. 208783 BRODY A. MCBRIDE, State Bar No. 270852 Singleton Law Firm 115 W. Plaza Street Solana Beach, CA 92075-1123 Telephone: (760) 697-1330 Fax: (760) 697-1329 E-mail: brody@slffirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez 18 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 16-cv-00735 HSG 23 Plaintiff, STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 24 v. 25 26 27 Judge: Courtroom: Trial Date: J. VANGILDER, et al., Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 2 Nov. 12, 2018 Defendants. 28 1 Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG) 1 DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, Case No. 16-cv-01320 HSG 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 J. VANGILDER, et al., 5 Defendants. 6 7 At the November 14, 2017 joint case management conference, the Court ordered counsel 8 for Plaintiffs Daniel Manriquez and Daniel Cisneros and counsel for Defendants S. Cupp, 9 J. Cuske, D. Melton, K. Ohland, J. Vangilder, and J. Vasquez (“the Parties”) to prepare a 10 proposed schedule for further proceedings in these related actions. In compliance with the 11 Court’s order, and pursuant to the Court’s stated preference to schedule the trial in this case on 12 November 12, 2018, the Parties propose the following case schedule for the Court’s approval. 1 All amended pleadings and/or motions to amend shall be filed no later than December 13 1, 2017; 14 15 The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures by January 2, 2018; 16 At the end of the initial-disclosure period, the Parties shall have until May 22, 2018, 17 to conduct all necessary non-expert discovery. To expedite discovery, the Court 18 grants the Parties leave to conduct the dispositions of incarcerated witnesses without 19 further order by this Court; Expert discovery shall begin on May 22, 2018. Any expert designations and reports 20 are due that date; 21 22 Expert discovery will close on June 22, 2018; 23 The discovery cut-off will coincide with the close of expert discovery; 24 1 25 26 27 28 The Parties note that this is an ambitious schedule, particularly as it pertains to expert discovery. In allowing only 30 days for expert discovery (which includes initial and rebuttal expert disclosures and reports, and expert depositions), there is a significant chance that circumstances will arise that prevent the Parties from completing expert discovery before the cutoff. The Parties will make every endeavor to work together diligently and amicably to meet all dates in this schedule, including the expert discovery dates. However, if despite the Parties’ diligent efforts, they are unable to meet these dates, they will move the Court to modify this schedule as appropriate. 2 Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG) 1 By June 25, 2018, the Parties will advise the Court if consolidation of these actions 2 for purposes of trial is desired and if not, an explanation of the reasons why these 3 two actions should not be consolidated for trial purposes; 4 The Parties shall have until and including July 23, 2018, to move for summary 5 judgment; 6 The joint pretrial conference for both of these matters shall be set for October 30, 7 2018, unless the Court is persuaded that these actions cannot be tried together; 8 The consolidated trial of these two actions is set to begin on November 12, 2018, 9 unless the Court is persuaded that these actions cannot be tried together. 10 // 11 // 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG) 1 2 3 The Parties are agreed as to the above schedule and respectfully request that Court adopt the schedule for purposes of these two cases. Dated: November 28, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 4 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California KYLE A. LEWIS Acting Supervising Deputy Attorney General 5 6 7 /s/ IAN MICHAEL ELLIS IAN MICHAEL ELLIS Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants S. Cupp, J. Cuske, D. Melton, K. Ohland, J. Vangilder, and J. Vasquez 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: November 28, 2017 /s/ TIMOTHY L. MOORE Timothy Lewis Moore Reed Smith, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros Dated: November 28, 2017 /s/ BRODY A. MCBRIDE Brody A. McBride Singleton Law Firm Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER 21 The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed case schedule and approves it. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.except the trial will begin on Tuesday, November 13, 2018 and August 30, 2018 is the last day to hear dispositive motions. 24 Date: __________________ 11/29/2017 25 26 27 ________________________________________ The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge SF2016401088; SF2016400816 21048002.docx 28 4 Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?