Cisneros v. Vangilder et al
Filing
53
ORDER Granting (docket no. 52 in 4:16-cv-00735-HSG and docket no. 49 in 4:16-cv-01320-HSG) STIPULATION of Case Schedule: Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2017; Designation of Experts due by 5/22/2018; Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/22/20 18; Dispositive Motion due by 7/23/2018; Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2018 03:00 PM.; Jury Selection/Jury Trial (5-day) set for 11/13/2018 08:30 AM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/29/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
KYLE A. LEWIS
Acting Supervising Deputy Attorney General
IAN MICHAEL ELLIS
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 280254
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1179
Fax: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: Ian.Ellis@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants S. Cupp, J. Cuske,
D. Melton, K. Ohland, J. Vangilder, and J. Vasquez
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TIMOTHY LEWIS MOORE, State Bar No. 305168
Reed Smith, LLP
101 2nd Street, STE 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 659-5651
Fax: (415) 391-8269
E-mail: tmoore@reedsmith.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros
GERALD SINGLETON, State Bar No. 208783
BRODY A. MCBRIDE, State Bar No. 270852
Singleton Law Firm
115 W. Plaza Street
Solana Beach, CA 92075-1123
Telephone: (760) 697-1330
Fax: (760) 697-1329
E-mail: brody@slffirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez
18
19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
DANIEL CISNEROS,
Case No. 16-cv-00735 HSG
23
Plaintiff, STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
24
v.
25
26
27
Judge:
Courtroom:
Trial Date:
J. VANGILDER, et al.,
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
2
Nov. 12, 2018
Defendants.
28
1
Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG)
1
DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,
Case No. 16-cv-01320 HSG
2
Plaintiff,
3
v.
4
J. VANGILDER, et al.,
5
Defendants.
6
7
At the November 14, 2017 joint case management conference, the Court ordered counsel
8
for Plaintiffs Daniel Manriquez and Daniel Cisneros and counsel for Defendants S. Cupp,
9
J. Cuske, D. Melton, K. Ohland, J. Vangilder, and J. Vasquez (“the Parties”) to prepare a
10
proposed schedule for further proceedings in these related actions. In compliance with the
11
Court’s order, and pursuant to the Court’s stated preference to schedule the trial in this case on
12
November 12, 2018, the Parties propose the following case schedule for the Court’s approval. 1
All amended pleadings and/or motions to amend shall be filed no later than December
13
1, 2017;
14
15
The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures by January 2, 2018;
16
At the end of the initial-disclosure period, the Parties shall have until May 22, 2018,
17
to conduct all necessary non-expert discovery. To expedite discovery, the Court
18
grants the Parties leave to conduct the dispositions of incarcerated witnesses without
19
further order by this Court;
Expert discovery shall begin on May 22, 2018. Any expert designations and reports
20
are due that date;
21
22
Expert discovery will close on June 22, 2018;
23
The discovery cut-off will coincide with the close of expert discovery;
24
1
25
26
27
28
The Parties note that this is an ambitious schedule, particularly as it pertains to expert
discovery. In allowing only 30 days for expert discovery (which includes initial and rebuttal
expert disclosures and reports, and expert depositions), there is a significant chance that
circumstances will arise that prevent the Parties from completing expert discovery before the
cutoff. The Parties will make every endeavor to work together diligently and amicably to meet all
dates in this schedule, including the expert discovery dates. However, if despite the Parties’
diligent efforts, they are unable to meet these dates, they will move the Court to modify this
schedule as appropriate.
2
Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG)
1
By June 25, 2018, the Parties will advise the Court if consolidation of these actions
2
for purposes of trial is desired and if not, an explanation of the reasons why these
3
two actions should not be consolidated for trial purposes;
4
The Parties shall have until and including July 23, 2018, to move for summary
5
judgment;
6
The joint pretrial conference for both of these matters shall be set for October 30,
7
2018, unless the Court is persuaded that these actions cannot be tried together;
8
The consolidated trial of these two actions is set to begin on November 12, 2018,
9
unless the Court is persuaded that these actions cannot be tried together.
10
//
11
//
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG)
1
2
3
The Parties are agreed as to the above schedule and respectfully request that Court adopt
the schedule for purposes of these two cases.
Dated: November 28, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
4
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
KYLE A. LEWIS
Acting Supervising Deputy Attorney General
5
6
7
/s/ IAN MICHAEL ELLIS
IAN MICHAEL ELLIS
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
S. Cupp, J. Cuske, D. Melton,
K. Ohland, J. Vangilder,
and J. Vasquez
8
9
10
11
12
Dated: November 28, 2017
/s/ TIMOTHY L. MOORE
Timothy Lewis Moore
Reed Smith, LLP
Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros
Dated: November 28, 2017
/s/ BRODY A. MCBRIDE
Brody A. McBride
Singleton Law Firm
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
21
The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed case schedule and approves it.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.except the trial will begin on Tuesday, November 13, 2018 and
August 30, 2018 is the last day to hear dispositive motions.
24
Date: __________________
11/29/2017
25
26
27
________________________________________
The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge
SF2016401088; SF2016400816
21048002.docx
28
4
Stip. Case Schedule; [Proposed] Order (Case Nos. 16-cv-00735 HSG; 16-cv-01320 HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?