Martinez et al v. Corizon Health Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/13/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TANTI MARTINEZ, et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-00881-JSW Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 9 10 CORIZON HEALTH INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 14 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 15 ORDERED that: 16 A. DATES 17 Jury Trial Date: Monday, October 2, 2017, at 8:00 a.m., 10 days 18 Jury Selection: September 27, 2017, at 8:00 a.m. 19 Pretrial Conference: Monday, September 11, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. 20 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 30, 2017, 9:00 A.M. 21 Last Day for Expert Discovery: April 28, 2017 22 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: February 15, 2017 23 Last Day for Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: March 15, 2017 24 Close of Non-expert Discovery: February 1, 2017 25 B. DISCOVERY 26 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 28 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non- 1 expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 2 supplementation has been completed. 3 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 4 This matter is referred for assignment to a Magistrate Judge to conduct a settlement 5 conference to be completed within 120 days of June 3, 2016. Counsel will be contacted by that 6 judge's chambers with a date and time for the conference. 7 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 8 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this Court upon its 9 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 upon a 10 showing of very good cause. A motion may take the form of a stipulation and proposed order 11 United States District Court Northern District of California pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-1(a)(5) and Civil L.R. 7-12, but the parties may not modify the pretrial 12 schedule by stipulation without a Court order. If the modification sought is an extension of a 13 deadline contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. A 14 conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties 15 are advised that if they stipulate to a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. 16 The only discovery schedule that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, 17 briefing schedules that are specifically set by the Court may not be altered by stipulation without a 18 Court order; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: June 13, 2016 22 23 24 ______________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?