Teespring, Inc. v. Stonemark Technologies LLC

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/2016. (ygrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

Download PDF
7 8 D IS T IC T R R NIA LI May 3, 2016 N o ge r s A ER onzalez R FO UNIT ED S 4 onne G Judge Yv H Attorneys for Plaintiff TEESPRING, INC. 3 RT 6 2 D RDERE OO IT IS S NO 5 Brett M. Schuman (SBN 189247) bschuman@goodwinprocter.com David L. Simson (SBN287900) dsimson@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: 415.733.6000 Fax.: 415.677.9041 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA OF C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 TEESPRING, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 4:16-cv-01116-YGR TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) vs. STONEMARK TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant. Courtroom: 1—4th Floor Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01116-YGR 1 2 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Teespring, Inc. hereby provides notice of dismissal of this action under Federal Rule 3 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), without prejudice. This dismissal is made with the consent of 4 Defendant Stonemark Technologies LLC, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs of 5 court and expenses. 6 7 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 Dated: May 2, 2016 By: /s/ Brett M. Schuman Brett M. Schuman (SBN 189247) David L. Simson (SBN 287900) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 9411 Te1.: 415.733.6000 Fax.: 415.677.9041 Email: bschuman@goodwinprocter.com dsimson@goodwinprocter.com 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff Teespring, Inc. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01116-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?