Teespring, Inc. v. Stonemark Technologies LLC
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/2016. (ygrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)
7
8
D IS T IC T
R
R NIA
LI
May 3, 2016
N
o ge r s
A
ER
onzalez R
FO
UNIT
ED
S
4
onne G
Judge Yv
H
Attorneys for Plaintiff TEESPRING, INC.
3
RT
6
2
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
NO
5
Brett M. Schuman (SBN 189247)
bschuman@goodwinprocter.com
David L. Simson (SBN287900)
dsimson@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415.733.6000
Fax.: 415.677.9041
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
OF
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
TEESPRING, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 4:16-cv-01116-YGR
TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)
vs.
STONEMARK TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Defendant.
Courtroom: 1—4th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01116-YGR
1
2
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Teespring, Inc. hereby provides notice of dismissal of this action under Federal Rule
3
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), without prejudice. This dismissal is made with the consent of
4
Defendant Stonemark Technologies LLC, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs of
5
court and expenses.
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
10
Dated: May 2, 2016
By: /s/ Brett M. Schuman
Brett M. Schuman (SBN 189247)
David L. Simson (SBN 287900)
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 9411
Te1.: 415.733.6000
Fax.: 415.677.9041
Email: bschuman@goodwinprocter.com
dsimson@goodwinprocter.com
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Teespring, Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
TEESPRING’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01116-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?