Dallas Buyers Club LLC v. Doe-73.189.187.56
Filing
12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Discovery.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
DALLAS BUYERS CLUB LLC,
Case No. 16-cv-01166-DMR
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8
DOE-73.189.187.56,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION TO EXPEDITE
DISCOVERY
Re: Dkt. No. 5
9
10
Plaintiff Dallas Buyers Club LLC filed this action on March 9, 2016, alleging copyright
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
infringement against a Doe Defendant identified only by an internet protocol (“IP”) address,
12
73.189.187.56. On March 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion to expedite discovery,
13
seeking leave to conduct discovery before the Rule 26 conference. [Docket No. 5.] Specifically,
14
Plaintiff seeks an order granting Plaintiff leave to issue a subpoena to Comcast Cable for records
15
related to the identity of the subscriber and account holder assigned Defendant’s IP address,
16
arguing that this information is necessary so that it may identify Defendant.
17
In its motion, Plaintiff argues that good cause supports its request for early discovery and
18
makes a number of assertions about the IP address at issue, including the alleged infringing
19
activity associated with the address and its physical location. However, Plaintiff has not filed any
20
evidence to support these and other assertions. Civil Local Rule 7-5 provides that “[f]actual
21
contentions made in support of . . . any motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration
22
and by appropriate references to the record.” Civ. L.R. 7-5(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to
23
expedite discovery is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff’s re-filing its motion in compliance
24
with the local rules.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?