Chapman v. Carneros Deli et al
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/30/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BYRON CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 23
10
CARNEROS DELI, et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 4:16-cv-01275-KAW
Defendants.
12
13
On September 22, 2017, the Court approved the parties’ consent decree. (Dkt. No. 22.)
14
Pursuant to the consent decree, the Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the provisions until
15
March 31, 2018, or until the parties agreed in writing that Defendants have fulfilled all of their
16
obligations. Id. at 5. The parties did not file any notices in this case, and the date for the
17
undersigned to retain jurisdiction has passed. On May 2, 2018, the Court issued an order to show
18
cause to Plaintiff by May 18, 2018 to explain why this case should not be dismissed with
19
prejudice. (Dkt. No. 23.) Plaintiff was advised that a dismissal with prejudice would be entered
20
and the case will be closed if he did not timely respond.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
To date, Plaintiff has not responded, so the case is dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk
shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2018
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?