Chapman v. Carneros Deli et al

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/30/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

BYRON CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 23

10

CARNEROS DELI, et al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 4:16-cv-01275-KAW

Defendants.

12
13

On September 22, 2017, the Court approved the parties’ consent decree. (Dkt. No. 22.)

14

Pursuant to the consent decree, the Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the provisions until

15

March 31, 2018, or until the parties agreed in writing that Defendants have fulfilled all of their

16

obligations. Id. at 5. The parties did not file any notices in this case, and the date for the

17

undersigned to retain jurisdiction has passed. On May 2, 2018, the Court issued an order to show

18

cause to Plaintiff by May 18, 2018 to explain why this case should not be dismissed with

19

prejudice. (Dkt. No. 23.) Plaintiff was advised that a dismissal with prejudice would be entered

20

and the case will be closed if he did not timely respond.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

To date, Plaintiff has not responded, so the case is dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk
shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2018
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge