Strumlauf et al v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 130

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/11/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 SIERA STRUMLAUF, BENJAMIN ROBLES, BRITTANY CRITTENDEN, 12 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 16 Defendant. 17 Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:485158022.1 Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 Pursuant to the Court’s January 5, 2018 Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment 2 filed by Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by 3 Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf, Benjamin Robles and Brittany Crittenden (“Plaintiffs”), 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall 5 have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims 7 are dismissed with prejudice. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take 9 nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 DATED: __________, 2018 January 11 13 14 HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1SMRH:485158022.1 Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?