Strumlauf et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Filing
130
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/11/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11 SIERA STRUMLAUF, BENJAMIN
ROBLES, BRITTANY CRITTENDEN,
12 individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
STARBUCKS CORPORATION,
16
Defendant.
17
Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:485158022.1
Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1
Pursuant to the Court’s January 5, 2018 Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment
2 filed by Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”), which dismissed all of the claims asserted by
3 Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf, Benjamin Robles and Brittany Crittenden (“Plaintiffs”),
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall
5 have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims
7 are dismissed with prejudice.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take
9 nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
DATED: __________, 2018
January 11
13
14
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1SMRH:485158022.1
Case No. 4:16-cv-1306-YGR
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?