Rodrigues v. Bank of America, NA et al
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 2/16/2017. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/2/17. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL L. RODRIGUES,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
No. C 16-1390 CW
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BANK OF
AMERICA PENSION PLAN and DOES 150,
ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
Defendants.
________________________________/
On July 1, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to
17
dismiss Plaintiff’s claims.
In that order, the Court granted
18
Plaintiff leave to amend the claim for benefits against the Bank
19
of America Pension Plan, after exhaustion, and the breach of
20
fiduciary duty claim against Bank of America, and to allege his
21
documents claim against the Plan Administrator, if Plaintiff made
22
a request for documents from the Plan Administrator and the
23
request was denied.
24
amended complaint was December 28, 2016.
25
received no further filings.
26
to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to
27
prosecute.
28
the date of this order.
The deadline for Plaintiff to file his
To date, the Court has
Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed
Any response shall be filed within fourteen days of
If Plaintiff does not file a response
1
within that time the Court will dismiss the case for failure to
2
prosecute.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: February 2, 2017
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?