Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Filing 1352

Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 1324 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Exhibit A to Oracle's Submission of Record Evidence Establishing Patches Contain Previously Registered Code.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273)
Sarah M. Ray (SBN 229670)
Brittany N. Lovejoy (SBN 286813)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
ORACLE CORPORATION
Dorian Daley (SBN 129049)
Peggy E. Bruggman (SBN 184176)
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7114
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

ORACLE CORPORATION
Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172)
10 Van de Graaff Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 781.238.6273
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle
International Corporation

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17
18

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a California corporation,
Plaintiffs,

19
20
21
22
23

v.
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES
1–50,

CASE NO. 4:16-cv-01393-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORACLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
PORTIONS OF EXHIBIT A TO
ORACLE’S SUBMISSION OF
RECORD EVIDENCE ESTABLISHING
PATCHES CONTAIN PREVIOUSLY
REGISTERED CODE

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S
ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01393-JST

1

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International

2

Corporation’s (together, “Oracle”) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Exhibit

3

A to Its Submission of Record Evidence Establishing Patches Contain Previously Registered Code

4

(“Oracle’s Submission”). Having considered: (1) Oracle’s Administrative Motion to Seal; and (2)

5

the Declaration of Brittany N. Lovejoy in support of Oracle’s Administrative Motion to Seal, IT

6

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Oracle’s Administrative Motion to Seal is GRANTED.

7
8

The Clerk of the Court shall file the following portions of Exhibit A to Oracle’s
Submission under seal:

9
10
11
12

Portion Containing
Confidential
Information

Designating Party

Pages 11-15, in their
entirety

Oracle

Court’s Ruling
Grant

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16
17

Dated: June 15, 2022

By:

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S
ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-01393-JST