Rutledge v. Colvin

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS re 21 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Bernadette Rutledge, Nancy A. Berryhill. Motions terminated: 20 First MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Bernadette Rutledge, 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Bernadette Rutledge, Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/17/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CHARLES BRUCE, 272772 HOMELESS ACTION CENTER 3126 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, CA 94705 Phone: (510) 540-0878 x 324 Fax: (510) 540-0403 cbruce@homelessactioncenter.org 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 BEN A. PORTER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 977-8979 Fax: (415) 744-0134 Ben.Porter@ssa.gov Attorney for Defendant 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 BERNADETTE RUTLEDGE, 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 4:16-CV-01689-KAW STIPULATION TO PLAINTIFF’S AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS AND PROPOSED ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff’s counsel, as Plaintiff’s assignee, be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). Order re EAJA fees – 4:16-cv-01689-KAW 1 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA 2 attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under 3 the EAJA. Payment of six thousand dollars ($6000.00) in EAJA attorney fees shall constitute 4 a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees, 5 expenses, and/or costs in connection with this action. 6 After this Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Commissioner will 7 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. The ability 8 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed 9 under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program and the Commissioner 10 will determine whether the fees are subject to an offset. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 11 598 (2010). Any payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the 12 Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a Federal debt, then the Commissioner shall 13 cause the payment of fees and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the 14 assignment executed by Ms. Rutledge (attached). 15 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social 16 Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of 17 the EAJA. 18 19 Dated: October 17, 2017 20 /s/ Charles Bruce CHARLES BRUCE Attorney for Plaintiff Bernadette Rutledge 21 22 23 24 Dated: October 17, 2017 25 By: 26 27 /s/*Ben A. Porter BEN A. PORTER Special Assistant United States Attorney * by email authorization 10/16/2017 28 Attorneys for Defendant Order re EAJA fees – 4:16-cv-01689-KAW 1 2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act 3 Fees And Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA 4 in the amount of six thousand dollars and zero cents ($6000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§ 5 1920, 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. 6 7 8 9 Dated: 10/18/17 10 11 THE HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order re EAJA fees – 4:16-cv-01689-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?