CafePress Inc. v. Stonemark Technologies LLC

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Stipulation filed by Stonemark Technologies LLC, CafePress Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/9/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2016)

Download PDF
7 8 9 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 11 12 13 ER 5/9/2016 H Attorneys for Plaintiff CafePress Inc. N R NIA zalez Rog ers FO S RT 6 n onne Go Judge Yv NO 5 D RDERE LI 4 OO IT IS S A 3 UNIT ED 2 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Ian C. Ballon, State Bar No. 141819 ballon@gtlaw.com Monica A. Hernandez, State Bar No. 280195 hernandezmo@gtlaw.com 1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 328-8500 Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA F D IS T IC T O R C RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Brian D. Ledahl, State Bar No. 186579 Email: bledahl@raklaw.com 12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: (310) 826-7474 Facsimile: (310) 826-6991 Attorneys for Defendant Stonemark Technologies, LLC 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 22 CAFEPRESS INC. Plaintiff, 23 24 25 26 Case No. 16-cv-01764 YGR (LB) STIPULTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT vs. STONEMARK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Defendant. 27 28 1 Stipulation re: Time To Respond To Complaint 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS Plaintiff CafePress Inc. served its complaint in this matter on April 8, 2016; and WHEREAS the parties have agreed upon an extension of thirty (30) days of Defendant Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint. 5 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, by and through counsel, stipulate and agree that 6 Defendant Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint in this matter shall 7 be extended by 30 days to May 31, 2016. 8 9 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 DATED: April 29, 2016 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Brian D. Ledahl 11 12 13 By: /s/ Brian D. Ledahl _________________ Brian D. Ledahl Attorneys for Defendant Stonemark Techologies, LLC 14 15 16 17 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Ian C. Ballon Monica A. Hernandez Joshua L. Raskin Vimal M. Kapadia 18 19 20 By:___/s/ Monica A. Hernandez (with approval) Monica A. Hernandez Attorneys for Plaintiff CafePress Inc. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint 1 2 3 ATTESTATION RE: SIGNATURES I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document by all individuals whose signatures appear thereon was obtained in advance of the filing. 4 5 6 By:__/s/ Brian D. Ledahl____________ Brian D. Ledahl 7 8 9 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?