CafePress Inc. v. Stonemark Technologies LLC
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Stipulation filed by Stonemark Technologies LLC, CafePress Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/9/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2016)
7
8
9
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
10
11
12
13
ER
5/9/2016
H
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CafePress Inc.
N
R NIA
zalez Rog
ers
FO
S
RT
6
n
onne Go
Judge Yv
NO
5
D
RDERE
LI
4
OO
IT IS S
A
3
UNIT
ED
2
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Ian C. Ballon, State Bar No. 141819
ballon@gtlaw.com
Monica A. Hernandez, State Bar No. 280195
hernandezmo@gtlaw.com
1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor
East Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: (650) 328-8500
Facsimile: (650) 328-8508
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
Brian D. Ledahl, State Bar No. 186579
Email: bledahl@raklaw.com
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 826-7474
Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
Attorneys for Defendant
Stonemark Technologies, LLC
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
OAKLAND DIVISION
20
21
22
CAFEPRESS INC.
Plaintiff,
23
24
25
26
Case No. 16-cv-01764 YGR (LB)
STIPULTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
vs.
STONEMARK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant.
27
28
1
Stipulation re: Time To Respond To Complaint
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS Plaintiff CafePress Inc. served its complaint in this matter on April 8, 2016;
and
WHEREAS the parties have agreed upon an extension of thirty (30) days of Defendant
Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint.
5
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, by and through counsel, stipulate and agree that
6
Defendant Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint in this matter shall
7
be extended by 30 days to May 31, 2016.
8
9
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
10
DATED: April 29, 2016
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
Brian D. Ledahl
11
12
13
By: /s/ Brian D. Ledahl _________________
Brian D. Ledahl
Attorneys for Defendant
Stonemark Techologies, LLC
14
15
16
17
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Ian C. Ballon
Monica A. Hernandez
Joshua L. Raskin
Vimal M. Kapadia
18
19
20
By:___/s/ Monica A. Hernandez (with approval)
Monica A. Hernandez
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CafePress Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint
1
2
3
ATTESTATION RE: SIGNATURES
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document by all individuals whose signatures
appear thereon was obtained in advance of the filing.
4
5
6
By:__/s/ Brian D. Ledahl____________
Brian D. Ledahl
7
8
9
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?