Robyn Griffin v. Samuel Merritt University

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Robyn Griffin, Samuel Merritt University, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/30/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MICHAEL A. SCHAPS (SBN 247423) THE SCHAPS LAW OFFICE, A.P.C. 732 THIRD STREET, SUITE B DAVIS, CA 96516 Telephone: (530) 238-5111 Facsimile: (530) 231-2829 Attorney for Plaintiff Robyn Griffin 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBYN GRIFFIN, an individual, Case No. 16-CV-01920-KAW Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. 13 14 15 SAMUEL MERRITT UNIVERSITY, a California Corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 /// 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 1 The parties hereto, having resolved their dispute pursuant to a written settlement 2 agreement executed on September 22, 2016, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of 3 this action, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Court shall retain 4 jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. 5 6 Dated: September 27, 2016 THE SCHAPS LAW OFFICE, A.P.C. 7 By: _________/s/_________________ Michael A. Schaps Attorney for Plaintiff Robyn Griffin 8 9 10 Dated: September 27, 2016 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 11 By: _________/s/_________________ Alexander Hernaez Attorney for Defendant Samuel Merritt University 12 13 14 15 16 17 It is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. 18 19 9/30/16 Dated: ________ __________________________ 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?