Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc.

Filing 92

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 91 Stipulation To Change Time. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2017)

Download PDF
1 MARK L. HOGGE (pro hac vice) SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI (pro hac vice) 2 NICHOLAS H. JACKSON (SBN 269976) DENTONS US LLP 3 1900 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 4 Telephone: (202) 408-6400 Facsimile: (202) 408-6399 5 Email: mark.hogge@dentons.com Email: shailendra.maheshwari@dentons.com 6 Email: nicholas.jackson@dentons.com 7 SARAH S. ESKANDARI (SBN 271541) DENTONS US LLP 8 One Market Plaza Spear Tower, 24th Floor 9 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 267-4000 10 Facsimile: (415) 267-4198 Email: sarah.eskandari@dentons.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DURIE TANGRI LLP SONALI D. MAITRA(SBN 254896) smaitra@durietangri.com TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY(SBN 281434) tsaulsbury@durietangri.com CATHERINE Y. KIM (SBN 308442) ckim@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 362-6666 Facsimile: (415) 236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant FUNAMBOL, INC. 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No.: 4:16-cv-02026-HSG 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER FUNAMBOL, INC., [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] 22 23 Defendant. Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02026-HSG 1 Defendant Funambol, Inc. (“Funambol”) and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 2 (“Synchronoss”), collectively (the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel and 3 subject to the Court’s approval, have met and conferred and stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on March 15, 2017, the Court issued an Order Setting Schedule that set a 5 March 31, 2017 deadline for the Parties to submit an ESI Stipulation and Protective Order (ECF 6 133). 7 WHEREAS, in light of the fact that, to date, the Parties continue to negotiate the ESI 8 Stipulation and Protective Order, and given the complexity of the case, have not yet come to an 9 agreement on the terms of such a stipulation and Protective Order, there is good cause to extend 10 the date for the Parties to submit their ESI Order and Protective Order by two court days, from 11 March 31, 2017, to and including April 4, 2017. 12 WHEREAS, there have only been three prior time modifications in this case with 13 respect to the Case Management Conference: (1) pending the Court’s decision on the 14 administrative motion to relate the case to Funambol and Egnyte; (2) pending the Court’s 15 decision on Funambol’s Motion to Dismiss in the related matter Synchronoss v. Dropbox, Case 16 No. 16-cv-00119-HSG (ECF 52, 57) and; (3) when the Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated 17 Request to continue the date of the Case Management Conference (ECF 78). See Civil L.R. 618 2(a)(2). 19 WHEREAS, the Parties’ requested extension will have no impact on the schedule for the 20 case overall, as the remaining deadlines in the Scheduling Order will be unaffected; the 21 requested two day extension will leave the Parties with three (3) weeks prior to the April 24, 22 2017 due date for Synchronoss’ Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions 23 and accompanying document production, per Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-2 and the Order 24 Setting Schedule (ECF 133); and the brief extension will not prejudice any Party. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02026-HSG 1 /// 2 /// 3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND 4 BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to the 5 Court’s approval: The date for the Parties to file their ESI Stipulation and Protective Order is 6 extended from March 31, 2017, to and including April 4, 2017. 7 8 Dated: March 31, 2017 DENTONS US LLP 9 10 By: /s/ Sarah S. Eskandari SARAH S. ESKANDARI MARK L. HOGGE SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI NICHOLAS H. JACKSON 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 14 15 16 Dated: March 31, 2017 DURIE TANGRI LLP 17 18 19 By: /s/ Timothy C. Saulsbury SONALI D. MAITRA TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY CATHERINE Y. KIM 20 21 Attorneys for Defendant Funambol, Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02026-HSG ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: April 4, 2017 6 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02026-HSG 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION: I, Sarah S. Eskandari, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 3 the above STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each listed counsel above has concurred in this filing. 6 7 8 Dated: March 31, 2017 By /s/ Sarah S. Eskandari SARAH S. ESKANDARI 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02026-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?