Electronic Frontier Foundation v. United States Department of Justice

Filing 63

ORDER GRANTING 62 Proposed Briefing Schedule: Motions due by 7/9/2018; Cross Motions/Oppositions due by 8/6/2018; Responses due by 9/6/2018; Replies due by 9/27/2018; Motion Hearing set for 10/25/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/14/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) Case No. 3:16-cv-02041-HSG 4:16-cv-02041-HSG ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) JUSTICE, ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. ) ) ) ) 14 15 16 17 Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Status Report and Proposed Briefing Schedule, ECF No. 62, the Court adopts the parties’ proposed schedule as set forth below: July 9, 2018 Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (25 pages) August 6, 2018 Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment/Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (25 pages) September 6, 2018 Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (25 pages) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 September 27, 2018 Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (25 pages) October 25, 2018 Requested hearing date 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-02041-HSG 3:16-cv-02041-HSG 1 AND IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6/14/2018 Dated: June ____, 2018 _________________________ _____ ________________ _ ____________ ________ ___ _ _ ____ Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Haywood w U.S. District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-cv-02041-HSG 4:16-cv-02041-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?