Papasan et al v. Dometic Corporation et al

Filing 96

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 94 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to 93 Plaintiffs' Second Amended Class Action Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705)
Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Robert C. Collins III (pro hac vice)
Emily R. Goebel (pro hac vice)
Adam L. Rosenbloom (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 2800
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
DOMETIC CORPORATION

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21

CATHERINE PAPASAN, NELSON AND
MARJORIE GOEHLE, ANDREW YOUNG,
JIMMY BYERS, CHRISTOPHER
JOHNSTON, RICHARD AND LEAH
VOLLBERG, TIMOTHY CHERRY, PAULA
MEURER, JILL AND SID GARRETT,
RICHARD LANDSHEFT, GARY GRAUS,
GWENDOLYN AND LOUIS KING, and all
persons similarly situated,

24
25

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
DOMETIC CORPORATION’S MOTION
FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

22
23

Case No. 4:16-cv-02117-HSG

Plaintiffs,
vs.
DOMETIC CORPORATION,
Defendant.

26
27
28
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO SAC
CASE NUMBER: 4:16-cv-02117 HSG

1
2

ORD
DER
Havin considered the papers in support o Dometic C
ng
d
of
Corporation’ (“Dometic Motion
’s
c”)

3

fo Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Ame
or
o
e
o
ended Class

4

Action Comp
A
plaint (“Moti
ion”) and go cause app
ood
pearing ther
refor, Domet
tic’s Motion is hereby

5

GRANTED. Dometic sh answer or otherwise respond to P
G
hall
o
e
Plaintiffs’ Second Amen
nded Class

6

Action Comp
A
plaint within fourteen (14 days after the later of (i) this Cour Order on Dometic’s
4)
r
f
rt’s
n

7

Motion to Tra
M
ansfer Venue (Dkt. No. 83) and (ii) t Judicial Panel on Mu
e
8
the
ultidistrict L
Litigation’s

8

decision on Plaintiffs’ Mo
P
otion to Tran
nsfer three o
other cases to this Court.
o

9

IT IS SO ORDER
RED.

10
11

DATED: Nov
D
vember 28, 2017
2

By:_
___________
__________
_______
H
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
m,
U
United States District Jud
s
dge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

OR
RDER ENLAR
RGING TIME T ANSWER OR
TO
OTH
HERWISE RE
ESPOND TO SAC
S
CASE N
NUMBER: 4:1
16-cv-02117 HSG
H