Connolly v. I2A Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
39
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE OF THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT. Show Cause Response due by 3/23/2017.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on February 23, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SANDRA L. CONNOLLY,
Case No. 16-cv-02131-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
I2A TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SERVICE OF THIRD-PARTY
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
12
Third-Party Plaintiff Victor Batinovich filed the third-party-complaint on November 4,
13
2016. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Third-Party Plaintiff was required to
14
serve Third-Party Defendants AIPAC, Inc., Tri Minh Hoang, and TRI HOANG GROUP dba
15
SEAR INSTITUTE within 90 days of the filing of the third-party complaint or by February 2,
16
2017, otherwise the court must dismiss the action without prejudice. The record shows that Third-
17
Party Defendants have not yet been served with the third-party complaint. Therefore, Third-Party
18
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing by no later than March 23, 2017, why the
19
third party complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve the summons and third-party complaint on the Third-Party
21
Defendants.
28
S
R NIA
FO
Ju
ER
H
27
RT
26
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu. Ryu
na M
United States Magistrate Judge
dge Don
NO
25
Dated: February 23, 2017
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
22
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?