Ticer v. Young et al
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 79 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Mark Ticer, Gregory Young, Board of Trustees of the California State University. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/26/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Alexis Alvarez (Cal. SBN 281377)
Jinny Kim (Cal. SBN 208953)
LEGAL AID AT WORK
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
Facsimile: (415) 593-0096
Email: aalvarez@legalaidatwork.org
jkim@legalaidatwork.org
Counsel for Plaintiff
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK TICER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
GREGORY YOUNG, et al.,
15
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
{00526011.DOC 3}
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2016, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint in this
1
2
matter.
3
WHEREAS, on July 31, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint.
4
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel.
5
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion and referred
6
Plaintiff to the Federal Pro Bono Project, staying proceedings pending the appointment of
7
counsel.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff also had a state case pending in Santa Clara Superior Court, Ticer
8
9
v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et al., Case No. 16CV297218, which was
10
based on the same underlying facts as this case and asserted state-law claims against Defendants
11
the Board of Trustees of the California State University (“the Board”) and former California
12
State University (“CSU”) Professor, Gregory Young.
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2017, Defendants filed the parties’ stipulation to consolidate
13
14
the instant matter and Plaintiff’s state case.
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2017, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation and, per the
15
16
stipulation, ordered Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint within 30 days.
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2017, the Court lifted the stay because the Federal Pro
17
18
Bono Project had not yet been able to find counsel for Plaintiff and set the next case management
19
conference for January 30, 2018.
20
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Third Amended Complaint.
21
WHEREAS, on December 29, 2017, Alexis Alvarez and Jinny Kim filed notices of
22
appearance as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter.
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2018, counsel for the parties met and conferred about the
23
24
status of the case and Plaintiff’s intention to file a Fourth Amended Complaint
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, Plaintiff’s counsel shared with opposing counsel a
25
26
draft of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint.
27
//
28
//
1
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
{00526011.DOC 3}
1
WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to the filing of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended
2
Complaint so long as Defendants have 30 days from the date of filing to file their motion to
3
dismiss.
4
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, subject to approval by the Court, that Plaintiff
5
Mark Ticer shall be granted leave to file his Fourth Amended Complaint as set forth in Exhibit A
6
and that Defendants shall have 30 days to file a motion to dismiss.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
10
Dated: February 26, 2018
11
Respectfully Submitted,
Alexis Alvarez
Jinny Kim
LEGAL AID AT WORK
12
13
By: /s/ Alexis Alvarez
ALEXIS ALVAREZ
Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK TICER
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: February 26, 2018
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JEFFREY R. VINCENT
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Kymberly E. Speer
KYMBERLY E. SPEER
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants Board of Trustees of
the California State University and Gregory
Young
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
{00526011.DOC 3}
1
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X. (B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from Defendants’ counsel.
3
4
Dated: February 26, 2018
LEGAL AID AT WORK
5
By: /s/ Alexis Alvarez
ALEXIS ALVAREZ
Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK TICER
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
{00526011.DOC 3}
ORDER
1
2
Having considered the Stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE appearing, this
3
Court hereby approves the foregoing stipulation and grants Plaintiff leave to file his Fourth
4
Amended Complaint. Defendants shall have 30 days to answer or to file a motion to dismiss.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: February ___, 2018
7
By:
8
9
______________________________________
The Honorable Kandis A. Westmore
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 4:16−cv−02198−KAW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT
{00526011.DOC 3}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?