Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Filing 187

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 186 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

DLA PIPER LLP (US)
Angela C. Agrusa (SBN 131337)
[e-mail]
Shannon E. Dudic (SBN 261135)
[e-mail]
2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400 North Tower
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MESSNER REEVES LLP
Charles C. Cavanagh (SBN 198468)
1430 Wynkoop Street, Suite 300
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

MARTIN SCHNEIDER, et al., individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,

18

Plaintiff,

19
20
21

v.

Case No.: 4:16-CV-02200-HSG
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
AMENDED MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
[DKT. NO. 182]

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., a
Delaware corporation,

22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28

DLA P IPER LLP
(US)
LOS ANGELES

WEST/286072644

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION
TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
4:16-CV-02200-HSG

1

ORDER

2

Having read, reviewed, and considered Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.’s (“Chipotle”)

3

Amended Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document (the “Motion”), the Court hereby GRANTS

4

the Motion.

5

As described in the Motion, due to technical issues, the redactions in the publicly-filed version

6

of Chipotle’s Motion to Decertify the Classes (the “Motion to Decertify”) were applied in a manner

7

that makes the text under the redactions accessible. Dkt. No. 182. Chipotle then publicly re-filed the

8

Motion to Decertify and accompanying attachments in their entirety as Dkt. No. 184. Because there

9

were no substantive changes to the Motion to Decertify, this re-filing does not affect the existing

10

briefing schedule.

11

The Court, therefore, orders as follows:

12

1.

Dkt. No. 182 shall be permanently sealed and restricted from public access.

13

2.

Chipotle’s re-filing of the Motion to Decertify at Dkt. No 184 shall not affect the

14

existing briefing schedule. Plaintiffs’ deadline to oppose the Motion to Decertify shall

15

remain May 8, 2019. Chipotle’s deadline to file its reply in support of the Motion to

16

Decertify shall remain May 15, 2019.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22

DATED: April 26, 2019
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

DLA P IPER LLP
(US)
LOS ANGELES

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION
TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT
4:16-CV-02200-HSG