Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Filing 74

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS 72 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/23/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MARTIN SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.,

Case No. 16-cv-02200-HSG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 72

Defendant.

12
13

On July 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granted in part and denied in part

14

Plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena for third-party Sandra Coller. See Dkt. No. 70. On

15

August 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from Judge Westmore’s order. Dkt. No. 72.

16

The Court has carefully reviewed Judge Westmore’s order, Plaintiffs’ motion, and the relevant

17

legal authorities. Judge Westmore’s order is well-reasoned and thorough. The Court affirms the

18

non-dispositive order because it is not “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” See Grimes v. City

19

& Cty. of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 240 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court DENIES

20

Plaintiffs’ motion for relief from Judge Westmore’s non-dispositive pretrial order.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/23/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge