Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Filing 74

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS 72 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/23/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARTIN SCHNEIDER, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., Case No. 16-cv-02200-HSG ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 72 Defendant. 12 13 On July 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granted in part and denied in part 14 Plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena for third-party Sandra Coller. See Dkt. No. 70. On 15 August 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from Judge Westmore’s order. Dkt. No. 72. 16 The Court has carefully reviewed Judge Westmore’s order, Plaintiffs’ motion, and the relevant 17 legal authorities. Judge Westmore’s order is well-reasoned and thorough. The Court affirms the 18 non-dispositive order because it is not “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” See Grimes v. City 19 & Cty. of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 240 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court DENIES 20 Plaintiffs’ motion for relief from Judge Westmore’s non-dispositive pretrial order. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/23/2017 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?