Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Filing
78
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 76 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Show Cause Response due by 9/18/2017. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/13/2017. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARTIN SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 76
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.,
Defendant.
11
12
Case No. 16-cv-02200-HSG (KAW)
On September 8, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to file under seal. (Dkt.
13
No. 76.) Plaintiff sought to file under seal exhibits that were identified by Defendant Chipotle
14
Mexican Grill, Inc. as being "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to a stipulated
15
protective order. (Id. at 1.) Per Local Rule 79-5(e), when "the Submitting Party is seeking to file
16
under seal a document designated as confidential by the opposing party . . . (1) [w]ithin 4 days of
17
the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a
18
declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material
19
is sealable."
20
As of September 13, 2017, Defendant has not filed the required declaration. Accordingly,
21
Defendant is ordered, on or before September 18, 2017, to: (1) file the required declaration
22
establishing that the designated material is sealable, and (2) respond to this order to show cause by
23
explaining why it did not file a timely declaration. Failure to complete both tasks by September
24
18, 2017 will result in this Court denying Petitioner's motion to file under seal.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 13, 2017
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?