Saberi v. Les Stanford Chevrolet Cadillac Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ; anddenying 16 Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 ANDY SABERI, 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 Plaintiff, Case No.: 16-CV-2203-YGR ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING vs. LES STANFORD CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC., ET AL., Defendants. 13 On May 6, 2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs’ 14 Motion for Remand so that the Court need not hear defendants’ motion to dismiss until after it has 15 reached a decision on the motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendants opposed plaintiff’s motion, 16 recommending instead that the motion to dismiss be continued to a date after the hearing on the 17 motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 18.) 18 The Court DENIES plaintiff’s Motion for Order Shortening Time to Hear Plaintiffs’ Motion 19 for Remand and CONTINUES the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss from Tuesday, June 14, 20 2016 to Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building, located at 21 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Notwithstanding the above, the briefing 22 schedules set for both hearings shall remain unchanged. If the Court deems necessary, it will 23 continue the motion to dismiss hearing to a later date. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Date: May 12, 2016 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?