Enertrode, Inc. v. General Capacitor Co. Ltd et al

Filing 103

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 102 Stipulation re docket no. 101 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 (Counsel listed on Signature Page) 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DVISION 11 12 In Re General Capacitor CASE NO. 4:16-cv-02458 HSG 13 Consolidated with Case No. 17-cv-179 HSG 14 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION AND REPLY IN ENERTRODE INC.’S MOTION TO AMEND (DKT. NO. 101) 16 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties in this case, Enertrode, Inc. (“Enertrode’) and 21 Linda Zhong (“Zhong”) (together, “the EnerTrode Parties”) and General Capacitor Co. Limited., 22 Jianping Zheng aka Jim Zheng, General Capacitor International, Inc., General Capacitor, LLC 23 (together, “General Capacitor”) submit this stipulation to extend the time: (a) for General 24 Capacitor to respond to Enertrode’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 101) (the “Amendment 25 Motion”) and (b) for Enertrode to reply thereto. 26 27 WHEREAS, under the Civil Local Rules, General Capacitor’s opposition to the Amendment Motion is due August 18, 2017; 28 1 In Re General Capacitor Case No. 16-CV- 2458 HSG Stipulation and Order 1 WHEREAS, under the Civil Local Rules, Enertrode’s reply is due by August 25, 2017. 2 WHEREAS the parties have been deeply engaged in discovery in this case during the 3 month of August, and their lead counsel are in preparation to conduct depositions in this case in 4 Hong Kong during the week of August 21, 2017; 5 WHEREAS the parties are unable to prepare their filings concerning the Amendment 6 Motion within the period envisaged by the Civil Local Rules due to intense sets of discovery, 7 including a number of overseas depositions next week; 8 9 WHEREAS the requested extension will not have any impact on the schedule for this case since it does not affect any hearing dates or other dates set by Court order. 10 11 NOW THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court: (a) extend by one 12 court day the time for General Capacitor to oppose Enertrode’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 13 101), and (b) extend by two court days the time for Enertrode to reply to such opposition. 14 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 Dated: August 18, 2017 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 In Re General Capacitor Case No. 16-CV- 2458 HSG Stipulation and Order /s/ Perry J. Narancic 1 Perry J. Narancic, SBN 206820 LEXANALYTICA, PC 2225 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94303 www.lexanalytica.com pjn@lexnalytica.com Tel: 650-655-2800 2 3 4 5 6 Attorney for all Defendants GENERAL CAPACITOR CO. LIMITED., JIANPING ZHENG aka JIM ZHENG, GENERAL CAPACITOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., GENERAL CAPACITOR, LLC 7 8 9 10 /s/ Michael W. Battin 11 Michael W. Battin, SBN 183870 Navigato & Battin, LLP 755 West A Street, Suite 150 San Diego, CA 92101 12 13 14 Attorney for ENERTRODE, INC. and LINDA ZHONG 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 In Re General Capacitor Case No. 16-CV- 2458 HSG Stipulation and Order 1 ORDER 2 GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, the deadline for General Capacitor to oppose 3 Enertrode’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 101) is extended by one court day, and the deadline for 4 Enertrode to reply to such opposition is extended by two court days. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATE: August 21, 2017 By: 9 10 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 In Re General Capacitor Case No. 16-CV- 2458 HSG Stipulation and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?