Congdon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 159

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 157 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CHUCK CONGDON, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9
10

CASE NO. 16-cv-02499-YGR
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

vs.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.,

Re: Dkt. No. 157

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration

13

regarding footnote nine of the Court’s previous order denying plaintiffs’ motion regarding

14

punitive damages (Dkt. No. 154). (Dkt. No. 157 (“Motion”).)

15

Plaintiffs indicate that they “are not seeking reconsideration of the Court’s legal ruling that

16

punitive damages are not available for [p]laintiffs’ conversion claim . . . .” (Motion at 2.) Rather,

17

their request pertains to an ancillary footnote in the Court’s order. As the request relates to matters

18

not material to the Court’s ruling, plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. See Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3).

19

With respect to the substance of the request, counsel may address the matter orally at the

20

next calling of the case. For the Court’s part, it considers the matter solely as overzealous

21

advocacy with respect to plaintiffs’ motion regarding punitive damages, nothing more.

22

This Order terminates Docket Number 157.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 25, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE