Congdon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
172
ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 171 re 171 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Anthony Martinez, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Cowden, Rasier-CA, LLC, Jorge Zuniga, Chuck Congdon ; DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/15/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
CHUCK CONGDON, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
9
10
CASE NO. 16-cv-02499-YGR
ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 171
vs.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed Order] Regarding
13
Pretrial Conference Statement and Other Deadlines. (Dkt. No. 171.) Therein, the parties request
14
that the Court continue the pretrial schedule until after it rules on plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’
15
fees, to the extent such motion is filed.
16
However, the Court notes that it vacated the “November 27, 2018 trial and related dates” in
17
its previous order. (Dkt. No. 170 at ECF p. 5.) Thus, the parties’ request is DENIED AS MOOT. In
18
the event any issues remain after the Court rules on any motion for attorneys’ fees, the Court will
19
set a new schedule, keeping the parties’ proposed dates in mind.
20
This Order terminates Docket Number 171.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 15, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?