Congdon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 172

ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 171 re 171 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Anthony Martinez, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Cowden, Rasier-CA, LLC, Jorge Zuniga, Chuck Congdon ; DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/15/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CHUCK CONGDON, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9
10

CASE NO. 16-cv-02499-YGR
ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 171

vs.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed Order] Regarding

13

Pretrial Conference Statement and Other Deadlines. (Dkt. No. 171.) Therein, the parties request

14

that the Court continue the pretrial schedule until after it rules on plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’

15

fees, to the extent such motion is filed.

16

However, the Court notes that it vacated the “November 27, 2018 trial and related dates” in

17

its previous order. (Dkt. No. 170 at ECF p. 5.) Thus, the parties’ request is DENIED AS MOOT. In

18

the event any issues remain after the Court rules on any motion for attorneys’ fees, the Court will

19

set a new schedule, keeping the parties’ proposed dates in mind.

20

This Order terminates Docket Number 171.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 15, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE