Congdon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers: denying 22 Motion to Stay. The Court VACATES the hearing currently set for September 13, 2016. Parties to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than 9:00 AM on Monday, September 12, 2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2016)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CHUCK CONGDON, ET AL.,

Case No. 16-cv-02499-YGR

Plaintiffs,
5

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

v.

Dkt. No. 22

6
7

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.

8
9

On July 19, 2016, defendants filed a Motion to Stay the above-captioned action pending
the Ninth Circuit’s decisions in Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., No. 15-16178 (9th

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Cir., filed June 11, 2015) and O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 15-17420 (9th Cir.,

12

filed Dec. 9, 2015). In light of the Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Mohamed issued on

13

September 7, 2016, the Court DENIES defendants’ Motion.1

14

The parties shall file a JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT in advance of the Case

15

Management Conference currently set for Monday, September 12, 2016, and no later than 9:00

16

a.m. on that day.2 The joint statement must include all elements requested in the “Standing Order

17

for All Judges of the Northern District of California—Contents of Joint Case Management

18

Statement,” as well as the parties’ perspectives on the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Mohamed.

19

This Order terminates Docket Number 22.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

Dated: September 7, 2016

22

______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23
24
25

1

26

2

27
28

The Court VACATES the hearing currently set on this Motion for September 13, 2016.

The parties are reminded that pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order, a joint case
management statement must be filed “seven days in advance of the initial case management
conference date.” Standing Order in Civil Cases ¶ 6. Failure to comply with the Local Rules or
the Court’s Standing Orders in the future may result in sanctions.